Archive \ Volume.16 2025 Issue 1

Treatment Outcomes and Factors Impacting Unsuccessful Outcome Among Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis Patients

, , , , , , ,
  1. Discipline of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia.
  2. Pak. International Medical College, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtoon Khawa, Pakistan.

  3. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Abbottabad University of Science and Technology, Havelian, Abbottabad, Pakistan.
  4. Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  5. Department of Pulmonology, Peshawar medical college Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtoon Khawa, Pakistan.
  6. District TB Office Bannu, District Bannu, KPK., Pakistan.

Abstract

Tuberculosis remains a significant public health challenge. The study aimed to identify factors influencing treatment outcomes for extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB). From January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, a retrospective study was carried out at the District Headquarter (DHQ) Hospital Bannu in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Pakistan. There were 107 EPTB patients in all, aged 12-90 years, with 39.3% of them being female and 60.7% of them being male. With the assent of the patient, demographic information, smoking habits, and co-morbidities were noted. Logistic regression was used in SPSS 23.0 to analyse the data. The treatment success rate was 58.9% among new and relapsed EPTB patients and 24.3% among new smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients, with an overall success rate of 83.2%. The likelihood of unsuccessful treatment outcomes was higher among patients aged 36-45 years (AOR = 1.17 95% CL: .416-7.37) and patients with comorbidities (AOR = 2.66; 95% CL: .895-7.94). The patients having symptoms like sweating (AOR = 0.335; 95%CL .130-.863) and cough (AOR = 3.03; 95% CL: 1.35-6.76) were factors associated with the unsuccessful treatment. This study reveals that the ratio of unsuccessful treatment outcomes is still high. Unsuccessful treatment outcomes are due to patient’s expiry, defaulter patients, treatment failure, and patient transfer. To reduce treatment interruptions, effective tracing strategies for patients who have been transferred and didn’t complete treatment due to being defaulters should be devised and deployed. A follow-up plan should be tailored to each patient.


Downloads: 320
Views: 4847

How to cite:
Vancouver
Hayat S, Ghadzi SMS, Shah F, Mehsud S, Malik O, Maula F, et al. Treatment Outcomes and Factors Impacting Unsuccessful Outcome Among Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis Patients. Arch Pharm Pract. 2025;16(1):12-8. https://doi.org/10.51847/Rd8huM1jXs
APA
Hayat, S., Ghadzi, S. M. S., Shah, F., Mehsud, S., Malik, O., Maula, F., Israr, M., & Khan, A. H. (2025). Treatment Outcomes and Factors Impacting Unsuccessful Outcome Among Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis Patients. Archives of Pharmacy Practice, 16(1), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.51847/Rd8huM1jXs

Download Citation
Keywords: Extra pulmonary tuberculosis, Unsuccessful treatment outcome, Successful treatment outcome, Pakistan

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease caused by a bacteria named Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The disease usually affects the lungs (pulmonary tuberculosis), but it can also affect other body parts (extrapulmonary tuberculosis). After HIV infection, TB is the second greatest cause of death from an infectious disease worldwide [1]. According to WHO 2023 report, based on 2022 global data, a total of 7.5 million people were diagnosed and reported with a new episode of tuberculosis (including new and relapse cases). Among these, 83% had pulmonary TB, while 17% had extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) [1].

Globally, the number of EPTB patients has increased in recent years [1]. The EPTB accounted for 17% of the 7.5 million notified TB cases, with rates ranging from 8% in the Western Pacific region to 22% in the Eastern Mediterranean region [1]. Pakistan is ranked fifth among countries with the highest burden of tuberculosis (TB), with an estimated 510,000 new cases emerging annually and around 15,000 cases of drug-resistant TB developing each year. The country accounts for 61% of the TB burden in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region and is estimated to have the fourth highest prevalence of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) globally. Key factors contributing to the rise of drug-resistant TB include delays in diagnosis, unsupervised and inappropriate drug regimens, inadequate treatment, poor follow-up, and the lack of social support programs for high-risk populations [2]. National TB Control Program of Pakistan (NTP), data revealed the percentage of recorded cases of EPTB in the nation rose from 15.4% to 20% [3].

Among the six WHO regions the Western Pacific Region, Southeast Asia Region, and Eastern Mediterranean Region had the highest treatment success rates. The African Region had a 79% treatment success rate, whereas the Americas and Europe Region had a 75% percent success rate [1, 4]. Few countries like India, Nigeria, and Ethiopia have reported inadequate levels of success while India (90.5%) reported optimal treatment outcomes [5-7].  It is reported somewhere else that the success rate for TB treatment was 94% [4]. The treatment success of EPTB patients in Pakistan is 60-88% [8, 9].

The analysis of TB treatment outcomes and the identification of related factors and predictors affecting the outcomes are necessary for the evaluation of NTP in Pakistan. NTP manages the availability of DOTs coverage for TB patients across the country. It also deals with the programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis [9]. Despite all the efforts of NTP, EPTB cases have been mostly neglected.

There is a limited information on the clinical characteristics and epidemiology of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB). To date, information regarding the factors and predictors of unsuccessful treatment outcomes among EPTB patients in study setting area remains scarce. Hence, this study was conducted to examine treatment outcomes and identify the factors and predictors linked to unsuccessful outcomes in EPTB patients in Pakistan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design

A retrospective study was designed.

Study Setting

The current study was conducted in the District level refereal hospital of Bannu, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Pakistan from January 1st - 2014 to December 31st -2018. It is a 244-bedded hospital associated with Bannu Medical College. Data based on socio-demographics, clinical characteristics, Using NTP recommendations for Pakistan, microbiological and other laboratory data of TB cases were gathered from TB registrations, treatment cards, and TB medical personal files. Every month, NTP receives data from TB patients treated at DHQ Bannu using an electronic nominal recording and reporting system (ENRS). 'Assumed TB patients,' as proposed by the National Tuberculosis Program guidelines were identified based on the symptoms, microscopy, and chest x-ray. Confirmed EPTB patients were registered and provided free treatment in the respective hospitals.

Patients took EPTB treatment recommended by NTP and WHO. Patients were given a standard anti-TB regimen. Patients who discontinued treatment for more than four weeks were contacted by telephone and tracked down by a TB coordinator.

Participants

The study included all participants who were enrolled at cited Hospital.

Study Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

All smear-positive and smear-negative extra pulmonary tuberculosis patients, new patients, and patients with relapse EPTB were included in the study. Patients who have PTB, females who were pregnant and children were excluded from the study.

Data Analysis

The data analysis tool used was the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) (version 23, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The relationship between patients' clinical, microbiological, and sociodemographic characteristics and unsatisfactory treatment outcomes was investigated using univariate analysis. Based on previously published research, their possible relationship to treatment outcomes, and suggestions from the clinical team and study supervisors, the independent variables for univariate analysis were chosen. Variables that were statistically significant in the univariate analysis were further examined using multiple logistic regression analysis to identify the final predictors of unsuccessful treatment outcomes. Variables with a p-value of <0.05 were considered statistically significant in the final model. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and p-values were reported for each predictor.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Socio-Demographics and Clinical Characteristics

A total of 107 patients were registered for present study. EPTB patients were included in the study. The study included 65 (60.7%) males and 42 (39.3%) females. Out of 107 patients, the more cases of EPTB were among the age group 26-35 years 34 (31.8%) and the lowest 4 (3.7%) were of age 15 years or younger. People living in rural areas have a high percentage of EPTB (74.8%).

Around (39.3% of patients were smear-positive EPTB. The majority of patients showed high percentages of sputum (86.0%), profuse sweating (80.4%), LOW (73.8%), LOA (68.2%), and hemoptysis (72.9%). Around 20 patients were co-morbid. They had diabetes (8.4%), Hypertension (HTN) (1.9%), and COPD (3.7%), as indicated in Table 1.

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics Clinical Characteristics of new and relapsed Pulmonary Tuberculosis patients

Variables

Patients (%)

Gender

 

Female

42 (39.3)

Male

65 (60.7)

Age (Years)

 

≤ 15

4 (3.7)

16-25

9 (8.4)

26-35

34 (31.8)

36-45

20 (18.7)

46-55

24 (22.4)

56-65

10 (9.3)

≥ 66

6 (5.6)

Weight (kg)

 

≤ 30

6 (5.6)

31-60

97 (90.7)

≥ 60

4 (3.7)

Residence

 

Urban

27 (25.2)

Rural

80 (74.8)

Marital status

 

Married

80 (74.8)

Unmarried

27 (25.2)

Smoking Habit

 

Male

6 (5.6)

Female

Non-smoker

1 (0.9)

100 (93.5)

Snuff

 

Male

Female

13 (12.1)

3 (2.8)

No

91 (85.0)

TB type

 

Smear positive

42 (39.3)

Smear negative

65 (60.7)

Patient type

New Patients

Relapse Patients

 

96 (89.7)

11 (10.3)

Chest X-ray

 

Unknown

4 (3.7)

Clear

3 (2.8)

Lesion

100 (93.5)

Symptoms

 

Sweat

 

Yes

86 (80.4)

No

21 (19.6)

Cough

 

Yes

63 (58.9)

No

44 (41.1)

Sputum

 

Yes

92 (86.0)

No

15 (14.0)

Fever

 

Yes

54 (50.5)

No

52 (48.6)

Shortness of Breath

 

Unknown

5 (1.2)

Yes

92 (86.0)

No

15 (14.0)

Loss of Weight

 

Yes

79 (73.8)

No

34 (31.8)

Loss of Appetite

 

Yes

73 (68.2)

No

34 (31.4)

Hemoptysis

 

Yes

78 (72.9)

No

29 (27.1)

Comorbidities

 

TB only

87 (81.3)

Diabetes Miletus

9 (8.4)

Hypertension

2 (1.9)

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease  (COPD)

4 (3.7)

Hypertension and Diabetes Miletus

2 (1.9)

Other comorbidities

3 (2.8)

Treatment Outcome

Table 2 shows the percentage of patients in both successful and unsuccessful treatment outcome categories. The overall success rate for PTB treatment, including cured and treatment-completed cases, in district Bannu was 89 out of 107 patients (83.2%). Among the unsuccessfully treated patients, 2 (1.9%) patients expired, 7 (6.5%) patients transfer out and 9 (8.4%) patients were defaulters. Among all newly diagnosed smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) cases, 26 (24.3%) patients were cured and 63 (58.9%) patients completed the treatment.

Table 2. Treatment outcome of smear positive and smear negative Pulmonary Tuberculosis patients.

Variables

Patients (%)

Total

Treatment outcome

 

89 (83.2)

Successful treatment

63 (58.9)

 

Cured

26 (24.3)

 

Unsuccessful treatment

 

18 (16.8)

Treatment failure

0 (0.0)

 

Patient Defaulter

9 (8.4)

 

Transferred out

7 (6.5)

 

Patient Expired

2 (1.9)

 

Factors Associated with Unsuccessful Treatment Outcomes

Table 3 shows factors associated with unsuccessful TB treatment outcomes. Age, new TB patients, sweat, and cough were statistically significant related with the unsuccessful treatment outcome among EPTB patients. The odds of unsuccessful treatment outcomes were higher among patients with age group 36-45 years (AOR = 1.17 95% CL: .416-7.37) compared to the patients with another age group. This study also found that the odds of unsuccessful treatment were higher among new EPTB patients (AOR = .180; 95%CL: .031-1.05) and the patients who showed symptoms of cough (AOR = 4.08; 95%CL: .867-19.24) and sweating (AOR = 0.335; 95%CL .130-.863).

 

 

Table 3. Unsuccessful treatment outcomes; Logistic regression.

Variables

Treatment outcome

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

Gender

Success

Unsuccessful

OR

(95%CL)

p-value

AOR (95%CL)

p-

value

Female

54 (50.5)

11 (10.3)

 

 

 

 

Male

35 (32.7)

7 (6.5)

Referent

1.19 (.470-0.712)

0.712

-

-

Age (Years)

 

 

 

 

 

 

≤ 15

4 (3.7)

0 (0.0)

Referent

0.000

0.999

-

-

16-25

8 (7.5)

1 (0.9)

Referent

.320 (.037-2.74)

0.298

-

-

26-35

24 (22.4)

10 (9.3)

Referent

.750 (.259-2.17)

0.59

-

-

36-45

16 (15.0)

4 (3.7)

Referent

3.05 (1.00-9.32)

0.05

Referent

1.17 (.416-7.37)

0.44

46-55

22 (20.6)

2 (1.9)

Referent

1.55 (.55-4.32)

0.397

-

-

56-65

9 (8.4)

1 (0.9)

Referent

0.667 (.129-3.44)

0.62

-

-

≥ 66

6 (5.6)

0 (0.0)

Referent

0.464 (0.52-4.17)

0.493

-

-

Weight (kg)

 

 

 

 

 

 

≤ 30

5 (4.7)

1 (0.9)

0.000

0.99

-

-

31-60

81 (75.7)

16 (15.0)

Referent

3.12 (.365-26.76)

0.29

-

-

> 61

3 (2.8)

1 (0.9)

Referent

1.22 (.106-14.07)

0.87

-

-

Residence

 

 

 

 

 

 

Urban

22 (24.7)

5 (4.7)

Referent

1.55 (.559-4.32)

0.39

-

-

Rural

67 (75.3)

13 (2.1)

 

 

-

-

Marital status

 

 

 

 

 

 

Married

60 (56.1)

11 (10.3)

Referent

1.12 (.421-3.00)

0.814

 

 

Unmarried

29 (27.1)

7 (6.5)

 

 

-

-

Smoking Habit

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

4 (3.7)

3 (2.8)

Referent

.514 (.279-.948)

0.03

-

-

No

85 (79.4)

15 (14.0)

 

 

-

-

Snuff

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

14 (13.1)

2 (1.9)

Referent

.800 (.079-8.16)

0.85

-

-

No

75 (70.1)

16 (15.0)

 

 

-

-

New TB case

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

83 (77.6)

13 (12.1)

Referent

.180 (.031-1.05)

0.05

Referent

.297 (.023-3.33)

0.313

No

6 (5.6)

5 (4.7)

 

 

 

 

Smear Type

 

 

 

 

 

 

Positive

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

33 (89.7)

9 (8.4)

0.000

0.999

-

-

No

56 (30.8)

9 (8.4)

 

 

 

 

Chest X-ray

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lesion

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

83 (77.6)

17 (15.9)

0.000

0.999

-

-

No

6 (5.6)

1 (0.9)

 

 

 

 

Symptoms

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sweat

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

71 (66.4)

15 (14.0)

Referent

4.08 (.867-19.24)

0.07

Referent

4.29 (.676-27.25)

0.123

No

18 (16.8)

3 (2.8)

 

 

 

 

Cough

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

51 (47.7)

12 (11.2)

Referent

0.335 (.130-.863)

0.02

Referent

.434 (.143-1.31)

0.140

No

38 (35.5)

6 (5.6)

 

 

 

 

Sputum

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

77 (72.0)

15 (14.0)

Referent

2.26 (.460-11.13)

0.31

-

-

No

12 (11.2)

3 (2.8)

 

 

 

 

Fever

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

44 (41.1)

10 (9.3)

Referent

1.28 (.514-3.20)

0.59

-

-

No

45

8

 

 

 

 

Shortness of Breath

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

22 (20.6)

4 (3.7)

Referent

.455 (.137-1.50)

0.197

-

-

No

67

14

 

 

 

 

Loss of Weight

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

66 (61.7)

13 (12.1)

Referent

0.703 (.255-1.94)

0.46

-

-

No

23 (21.5)

5 (4.7)

 

 

 

 

Loss of Appetite

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

60 (56.1)

13 (12.1)

Referent

.879 (.334-2.31)

0.79

-

-

No

29 (27.1)

5 (4.7)

 

 

 

 

Hemoptysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

65 (60.7)

13 (12.1)

Referent

1.33 (.460-3.86)

0.59

-

-

No

24 (22.4)

5 (4.7)

 

 

 

 

Comorbidities

 

 

 

 

 

 

TB only

72 (67.3)

15 (14.0)

Referent

2.66 (.895-7.94)

0.07

0.391 (.139-1.1)

0.075

Diabetes Miletus

7 (6.5)

2 (1.9)

Referent

.375 (.022-6.34)

0.49

 

 

Hypertension

2 (1.9)

0 (0.00)

0.000

0.99

-

-

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease  (COPD)

4 (3.7)

0 (0.00)

1.5 (.055-40.63)

0.810

-

-

Hypertension and Diabetes Miletus

1 (0.9)

1 (0.9)

0.000

0.99

-

-

Other comorbidities

3 (2.8)

0 (0.00)

0.000

0.99

-

-

 

 

In current study, the rate of unsuccessful treatment was 16.8%, while the success rate for EPTB treatment stood at 83.2%. This indicates a suboptimal treatment success rate among EPTB patients in Pakistan. Our findings align with success rates reported in other regions, such as 86% in Bénin [10], 85.2% in southern Ethiopia [11], and 83% in Uzbekistan [12]. Whereas, study conducted in Ghana, argumented that extrapulmonary success rate was lower due to some condition like geriatric [13]. However, contrasting our results, a higher treatment success rate has been reported in China [14, 15]. In our study, the overall treatment success rate for EPTB patients was less than the 90% WHO target. Comparably, success rates have also been reported by other countries with large tuberculosis burdens, including as Pakistan (71.1%) [16], India (74%) [17], and Somalia (81.8%) [18]. Variations in treatment outcomes can be attributed to factors such as sample size, study settings, patient facilities, adherence to medication, and local beliefs among EPTB patients.

The treatment failure rate in this study is 16.8%. Cases of patient noncompliance accounted for a significant portion of the unsuccessful outcomes, aligning with findings from parallel studies in Ukraine and Serbia [19, 20]. In this study, the main explanation for the unsuccessful treatment rate is patient default, a loss to follow-up due to transferring out, and patient expiry. Moreover, literature consistently reported on follow-up loss in tuberculosis patients with comorbid condition, adverse drug reactions, drug addiction, smoking, poor adherence are contributing factors towards poor treatment outcomes [21-26]. Additionally, the increased rate of loss to follow-up among TB patients may have led to the development of more complex and drug-resistant TB strains, ultimately resulting in higher mortality.

The majority of the EPTB patients were males (60.7%) which was consistent with other studies Uganda [27], and Ethiopia [11], Somalia [17], Ukrain [18], and Denmark [25]. The reason could be that men might be placed in social networks in such a way that they interact with a greater number of people or social groupings. The greater prevalence in males could also be attributable to biological processes that create differential susceptibility to TB.

A notable link was found between age, TB cases, symptoms, and co-morbidities. The prevalence of co-morbidities was higher in males; out of 107 patients in the study, 21 had various co-morbidities, with EPTB-DM and EPTB-COPD being the most common. Additionally, 2.8% of patients had EPTB-HEPATITIS, and 1.9% had EPTB-HTN. Diabetes was a major condition alongside PTB in our study. It has been reported that patients with diabetes-related co-morbidities faced a greater risk of poor outcomes and mortality [28]. In South-Eastern Iran, smoking, hepatitis, diabetes, anemia, and drug misuse were identified as predictors of TB mortality. These results suggest that TB programs should prioritize identifying high-risk groups for TB-related diseases and developing appropriate treatments to enhance treatment outcomes [29]. According to a real-world study, TB, smoking, COPD, and HIV have both detrimental and synergistic effects [30, 31].

The coexistence of TB and a baseline condition may promote disease progression and raise the risk of drug-drug interactions or side effects. Comorbidities were linked to a 1.9-fold increased chance of treatment failure, highlighting the need of identifying, monitoring, and treating comorbidities in patients getting TB treatment [22, 24, 25, 28, 31-33].

Multivariate analysis revealed that factors statistically linked to unsuccessful treatment outcomes included being in the 36-45 year age group, having new EPTB cases, and experiencing severe night sweating and cough. Patients aged 36-45 years had higher odds of unsuccessful treatment outcomes (AOR = 1.17, 95% CI: 0.416–7.37) compared to those in other age groups. This finding contrasts with study from Southern Ethiopia, where most patients were of working age (15-55 years). Although older patients in our study had lower treatment success rates than younger ones, this may be because treatment is often more complex and challenging in older EPTB patients. Additionally, cough and sweating were associated with unsuccessful treatment outcomes [34]. Patients aged less than 18 years were more likely to develop fever, night sweats, and hemoptysis, according to some studies [35, 36]. Dyspnea and weight loss may have been linked to a later stage of the disease, which has been impacted more by diagnostic delays, as well as poorer clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights that the rate of unsuccessful treatment outcomes remains high, with an observed treatment success rate of 83.2%. By 2035, the WHO expects a 100% treatment success rate for EPTB patients in Pakistan. The current unsuccessful outcomes are attributed to factors such as loss to follow-up, defaulting, treatment failure, and mortality. A significant number of patients were lost to follow-up or died during therapy, raising serious concerns and calling for immediate action. In order to minimise treatment interruptions and trace patients who are lost to follow-up, effective tracing procedures should be established. To enhance their results, patients who are more likely to experience treatment failure should also have more oversight and monitoring.

These findings may not be fully applicable to the entire EPTB patient population across the country, given the unique demographics of DHQ Bannu, which serves TB patients from remote and rural regions. Due to the nature of the study and its methodological limitations, detailed clinical variables, drug side effects, and factors influencing loss to follow-up and mortality rates were not thoroughly examined.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The authors wish to thank the local health authorities for approving the study and also express their appreciation to the paramedic staff for their assistance with data collection at the study center.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None

FINANCIAL SUPPORT: None

ETHICS STATEMENT: Ethical approval for data collection was granted from District TB control program office.

References
  1. Organization WH. World Health Organization global tuberculosis report 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2023/tb-diagnosis---treatment/2-1-case-notifications
  2. Organization WH. World Health Organization global tuberculosis report (Pakistan) 2023. Available from: https://www.emro.who.int/pak/programmes/stop-tuberculosis.html
  3. National TB Control Program of Pakistan (Strategic Plan 2020-23). Available from: https://ntp.gov.pk/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/TB%20NSP%20-2020-2023.pdf
  4. Organization WH. Tuberculosis in the WHO African Region: 2023 progress update. Available from: https://www.afro.who.int/sites/default/files/2023-09/Tuberculosis%20in%20the%20African%20Region_2023%20report.pdf
  5. Jackson C, Stagg H, Doshi A, Pan D, Sinha A, Batra R, et al. Tuberculosis treatment outcomes among disadvantaged patients in India. Public Health Action. 2017;7(2):134-40.
  6. Sariem CN, Odumosu P, Dapar MP, Musa J, Ibrahim L, Aguiyi J. Tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a fifteen-year retrospective study in Jos-North and Mangu, Plateau State, North - Central Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1224. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09289-x
  7. Limenh LW, Kasahun AE, Sendekie AK, Seid AM, Mitku ML, Fenta ET, et al. Tuberculosis treatment outcomes and associated factors among tuberculosis patients treated at healthcare facilities of Motta Town, Northwest Ethiopia: a five-year retrospective study. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):7695. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-58080-0
  8. Ahmad T, Khan M, Khan MM, Ejeta E, Karami M, Ohia C. Treatment outcome of tuberculosis patients under directly observed treatment short course and its determinants in Shangla, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan: a retrospective study. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2017;6(4):360.
  9. Tahseen S, Khanzada FM, Baloch AQ, Abbas Q, Bhutto MM, Alizai AW, et al. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis in Pakistan-A nation-wide multicenter retrospective study. PloS one. 2020;15(4):e0232134.
  10. Ade S, Affolabi D, Adjobimey M, Ade G, Anagonou S, Kumar AMV, et al. Operational research within the national tuberculosis control programme in Benin. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):651. doi:10.1186/s13104-017-2987-9
  11. Gebrezgabiher G, Romha G, Ejeta E, Asebe G, Zemene E, Ameni G. Treatment outcome of tuberculosis patients under directly observed treatment short course and factors affecting outcome in southern Ethiopia: a five-year retrospective study. PloS one. 2016;11(2):e0150560.
  12. Gadoev J, Asadov D, Tillashaykhov M, Tayler-Smith K, Isaakidis P, Dadu A, et al. Factors associated with unfavorable treatment outcomes in new and previously treated TB patients in Uzbekistan: a five-year countrywide study. PloS one. 2015;10(6):e0128907.
  13. Puplampu P, Kyeremateng I, Asafu-Adjaye O, Asare AA, Agyabeng K, Sarkodee R, et al. Evaluation of treatment outcomes among adult patients diagnosed with tuberculosis in Ghana: a 10 year retrospective review. IJID Regions. 2024;10:9-14. doi:10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.11.004
  14. Wang X, Cai J, Wang D, Wang Q, Liang H, Ma A, et al. Registration and management of community patients with tuberculosis in north-west China. Public Health. 2015;129(12):1585-90.
  15. Ai X, Men K, Guo L, Zhang T, Zhao Y, Sun X, et al. Factors associated with low cure rate of tuberculosis in remote poor areas of Shaanxi Province, China: a case control study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):1-8.
  16. Atif M, Fatima R, Ahmad N, Babar ZU. Treatment outcomes of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in Bahawalpur, Pakistan; A record review. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2020;13:35. doi:10.1186/s40545-020-00227-1
  17. Chakaya J, Khan M, Ntoumi F, Aklillu E, Fatima R, Mwaba P, et al. Global tuberculosis report 2020–reflections on the global TB burden, treatment and prevention efforts. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;113:S7-S12.
  18. Ali MK, Karanja S, Karama M. Factors associated with tuberculosis treatment outcomes among tuberculosis patients attending tuberculosis treatment centres in 2016-2017 in Mogadishu, Somalia. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;28(1):197.
  19. Priedeman Skiles M, Curtis SL, Angeles G, Mullen S, Senik T. Evaluating the impact of social support services on tuberculosis treatment default in Ukraine. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0199513.
  20. Stosic M, Vukovic D, Babic D, Antonijevic G, Foley KL, Vujcic I, et al. Risk factors for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among tuberculosis patients in Serbia: a case-control study. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1-8.
  21. Laghari M, Sulaiman SAS, Khan AH, Memon N. Epidemiology of tuberculosis and treatment outcomes among children in Pakistan: a 5 year retrospective study. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5253. doi:10.7717/peerj.5253
  22. Laghari M, Talpur BA, Sulaiman SAS, Khan AH, Bhatti Z. Adverse drug reactions of anti tuberculosis treatment among children with tuberculosis. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2020;9(3):281-8. doi:10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_75_20
  23. Jaber AAS, Khan AH, Sulaiman SAS. Evaluating health-related quality of life of lost to follow-up tuberculosis patients in Yemen. Int J Pharmacol Pharm Sci. 2019;13(2):83-7.
  24. van Zyl Smit RN, Pai M, Yew WW, Leung C, Zumla A, Bateman E, et al. Global lung health: the colliding epidemics of tuberculosis, tobacco smoking, HIV and COPD. Eur Respir J. 2010;35(1):27-33.
  25. Holden IK, Lillebaek T, Seersholm N, Andersen PH, Wejse C, Johansen IS. Predictors for pulmonary tuberculosis treatment outcome in Denmark 2009–2014. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):12995. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-49439-9
  26. Lagharia M, Talpur BA, Sulaimana SAS, Khan AH, Bhatti Z. Assessment of adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment and predictors for non-adherence among the caregivers of children with tuberculosis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021;15(8):904-13. doi:10.1093/trstmh/traa161
  27. Kirenga BJ, Levin J, Ayakaka I, Worodria W, Reilly N, Mumbowa F, et al. Treatment outcomes of new tuberculosis patients hospitalized in Kampala, Uganda: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e90614.
  28. Chiang CY, Bai KJ, Lin HH, Chien ST, Lee JJ, Enarson DA, et al. The influence of diabetes, glycemic control, and diabetes-related comorbidities on pulmonary tuberculosis. PloS one. 2015;10(3):e0121698.
  29. Alavi-Naini R, Moghtaderi A, Metanat M, Mohammadi M, Zabetian M. Factors associated with mortality in tuberculosis patients. J Res Med Sci. 2013;18(1):52.
  30. Khan AH, Sulaiman SAS, Hassali MA, Khan KU, Ming LC, Mateen O, et al. Effect of smoking on treatment outcome among tuberculosis patients in Malaysia; A multicenter study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:854. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-08856-6
  31. Tao NN, Li YF, Song WM, Liu JY, Zhang QY, Xu TT, et al. Risk factors for drug-resistant tuberculosis, the association between comorbidity status and drug-resistant patterns: a retrospective study of previously treated pulmonary tuberculosis in Shandong, China, during 2004–2019. BMJ Open. 2021;11(6):e044349.
  32. Khan AH, Sulaiman SAS, Laghari M, Hassali MA, Muttalif AR, Bhatti Z, et al. Treatment outcomes and risk factors of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis in patients with co-morbidities. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):691. doi:10.1186/s12879-019-4312-9
  33. Ridolfi F, Peetluk L, Amorim G, Turner M, Figueiredo M, Cordeiro-Santos M, et al. Regional prospective observational research in tuberculosis (RePORT)–Brazil consortium. tuberculosis treatment outcomes in Brazil: different predictors for each type of unsuccessful outcome. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;76(3):e930-7. doi:10.1093/cid/ciac541
  34. Oshi DC, Oshi SN, Alobu I, Ukwaja KN. Profile and treatment outcomes of tuberculosis in the elderly in southeastern Nigeria, 2011–2012. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e111910.
  35. Schaaf HS, Collins A, Bekker A, Davies PD. Tuberculosis at extremes of age. Respirology. 2010;15(5):747-63.
  36. Duru CB. Tuberculosis treatment outcomes and determinants among patients treated in hospitals in Imo state, Nigeria. Open Access Lib J. 2016;3(06):1.

 

 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).