Prevalence and factors influencing self-medication in Medina Al-Munawara, Saudi Arabia
Abdullah T. Allam1*, Soliman M. Amer2,3
1Saudi Board Community Medicine, Madinah, Saudi Arabia. 2Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia. 3Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Damietta Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Damietta, Egypt.
Abstract
Background: The exact definition of self-medication is "the selection and usage of certain medication by individuals to treat self-recognized disease and symptomatology. This practice might influence health care institutes toward this point. This behavior might have certain adverse effects like wastage of resourced and missing of hazardous diagnosis. Objectives: To assess the Prevalence, current knowledge, and attitude towards self -medication among the population attending primary health care centers in Medina city after MOH Ministerial Warns against Selling Antibiotics without prescription and to examine self -medication associated risk factors among the studied population. Subjects and methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Medina City, Saudi Arabia during November 2019. A multistage, stratified random sampling procedure was used. The data was collected by a structured interview questionnaire. Data collection was done through interviews with the participated subjects by the researcher himself. Results: The response rate was 91.75 % (367/4000. The self-medication's prevalence among the studied population was 74.7%. The common complaints of self-medication were headache and body aches (47.1%), flu and cough (24.4%), and sore throat (9%). The most common type of drugs used as self-medication was antipyretics (55%), analgesic (51.2%), decongestants (20.7%) and antibiotics (15.3%), Regarding reasons of self-medication, minor illness (47.4%), saving time & money (15.3%), 31 avoid crowding at PHC (11 .3%), previous good experience with the drug (7.7%), high cost of consultations (5.5%) and emergency (4.4%) were the common Uses. Conclusion: There is a considerable high proportion of self-medication among the Saudi population in Medina city y. The most common self- medication used by the studied sample was the antipyretics. The study findings showed the effect of law that prohibits the purchase of antibiotics without prescription indicating the importance of generalization of the prohibition of all prescription drugs.
Keywords: self-medication, prevalence, risk factors, Saudi Arabia
INTRODUCTION
One of the most important responsibilities of Ministry of Health is planning, policy making, and investing in mental health [1, 2]. The purpose of pharmaceutical care is to provide patient-oriented care in an outcome-oriented manner [3]. As an important health factor, health promotion is of the responsibility of individuals and can lead them to higher levels of health [4]. The exact definition of self-medication is "the selection and usage of certain medication by individuals to treat self-recognized disease and symptomatology [5]. Such ailments may be fever, body pains, indigestion, diarrhea, etc. ln any case, several people, friends, relatives may advise the sick person on the type of medicine to take as a cure. The medicine may be an herb or a conventional drug which may be bought over the counter. This practice constitutes what is called self-medication [6]. Self-medication practice influences the health care seeking behavior of individuals. It leads to wastage of resources, delays in diagnosis of problems, and appropriate treatments. It can also lead to serious health hazards and adverse drug reactions [7, 8]. The studies in India showed that self-medication was 74% prevalent in students. The most common medications were antipyretics, analgesics, and antibacterial medications [9]. Other studies investigating the same problem in students were seen in Serbia [10], Karnataka [11], South India [12] eastern China [13], in Brazil [14] West Bengal [15], and Mekele University, Ethiopia [16-18].
In a recent community-based survey in Alexandria, Egypt, the prevalence of self-medication was 86.4%; the most commonly used drugs were analgesics (96.7%), and cough and cold preparations (81.9%), while antibiotics abuse was 53.9% [19].
Another recent Saudi study was conducted in Al Wazarat Health Center, Riyadh City, to determine the prevalence and predictors of prescription with antibiotics among the attending patients. Among the included 68 I patients, the prevalence of self-prescription with antibiotics was 78.7%. Amoxicillin was the most used self-prescribed antibiotic with a prevalence of (22.3%). Friend advice on self-prescription of antibiotics use and pharmacy near to the participants were the most common predictors for self-prescription with antibiotics [20]. Comparing these recent results with that reported in an old study conducted 1992 in the same city, Riyadh [21], where the reported prevalence was only 35%, indicating that lack of advice, easy accessibility to medications increase the risk of self-medication.
One of the commonest medicine in self-medication studies was the antibiotics causing an accelerated growth of microbial resistance towards the most effective antimicrobial agents, WHO established a program named “WHO Global Strategy for Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance” to confront this challenge Self-medication is a global phenomenon and its associated adverse consequence represents an emerging challenge to health care providers [22-24].
In Saudi Arabia, a study investigating the prevalence of the use of un-prescribed antibiotics was conducted using an online survey and snowball technique. About 34% of respondents have used antibiotics without a prescription, and 81.3% of them knew that it might be harmful to health. Regarding the reason for antibiotic use, tonsillitis was (76.7%) and the previous experience of using a particular antibiotic (52.1%) respectively. The previous medical prescription was the most source of knowledge (36.6 %).The study concluded that more serious steps should be implemented to forbid the sale of antibiotics without prescription [23].
On April 2018, The Saudi Ministry of Health (MOH) has applied a law prohibiting the selling of antibiotics without a prescription issued by a doctor with a license to practice in the Kingdom [24].
In Medina, the Saudi literature concerning self- medication prevalence and predictors was lacking and the recent study was based on special groups of population; medical students at Taibah University where 66% and 60.3% of the studied 326 students used self -medication & analgesic self-medication, respectively [25]. No community studies, however, were not found in the literature concerning the Medina region. To deal with this challenge in different Saudi regions, including Medina region, accurate epidemiologic data based on community basis are need to beta understanding the problem and to develop sound intervention and control programs helping in alleviation the public health risks arising from improper practices of self-medication. The study aimed to assess the outcome of MOH against antibacterial prescription among the population in Madina City and the magnitude of self-medication with its risk factor. The study also assessed the prevalence, current knowledge, and attitude of the studied population towards self-medication.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study type, setting, and population
This was a cross-sectional study among the primary health care population in Madina city, Saudia Arabia to measure the presence of self-medication and risk factors. Medina is the second most important Islamic pilgrimage destination after Mecca, is an important regional capital of the western Saudi Arabian province of Al-Medina. The Saudi population of Al-Medina city was 1.1 million according to the 2010 Census [26, 27]. The basic health care system in Saudi Arabia includes primary, secondary, and tertiary health care services, primary health care centers are distributed all over the Kingdom to provide primary health care services to the population. There are 133 Primary health care centers across Al-Medina. Of these centers, 49 centers are belonging to MOH [28]. In this study, all populations above the age of 18 years attended the primary health care centers during November 20 19, were eligible to participate.
Sampling procedures
The random sampling technique was a multistage, stratified sampling. Medina city was divided into 4 regions (east, west, north, and south). From each region, 2 MOH primary health care centers were randomly chosen. Accordingly, the study included 8 MOH primary health care centers. The population above 18 years old attended the selected primary health care centers during November 2019 will be eligible to participate in the study.
The primary calculated sample of this study 378 subjects based on averages of self-medication prevalence in the previous mentioned Saudi studies (56%), with assumed precision of 5% and a confidence interval of 95%, the sample size leveled up to 400 subjects (50 subjects from each studied PHC).
Data collection
The data were collected by a structured valid interview questionnaire. The questionnaire was divided into 5 sections. The first section included socio-demographic and lifestyle data. The second section included data about the availability of a health care facility. The last three sections included data about self-medication use, knowledge, and attitude. Since there was no internationally valid questionnaire, the validity of our questionnaire was examined by two epidemiologists and a pharmacologist. Data collection was done through an interview with the participated subjects by the researcher himself [29].
Study variables
Self-medication was the studied dependent variable was assessed by the following questions: “Apart from treatment(s) prescribed by your general practitioner, do you sometimes take any other medication to treat yourself?” followed by, "What is the origin of medications’? including i) previously prescribed for "chronic diseases", ii) pharmacist recommendation, iii) friends or family member, vi) purchased by the subject over the counter at a pharmacy. Other included questions to assess this variable are “What are types of medications?”, “For what?”, and for whom?
The explanatory variables in this study included the following: i) Socio-demographic characteristics: age, sex, educational level, occupation, monthly family income residence; ii) lifestyle factors: smoking and exercise; and (iii) self-medication related factors: reasons of self-medication cost in terms of out-packets, and knowledge and attitude of the studied subjects Awards self-medication.
The knowledge variables were based on 12 closed questions including questions about concept and health hazards of self-medication. The knowledge examination as done by its categorization into good, fair, and poor according to each of its components does" was given score = I, and "no" and "do not know" was given 0 scores). Good knowledge was defined if the subject's correct answers more than 75°/c, fair knowledge between (50-75%), and finally poor knowledge if less than 50%. The study questionnaire also included 18 study items. Each item will be scored as follows: 1 = disagree; 2= neutral; 3= totally agree.
Statistical analysis
All data analyses were done by using the SPSS program, version 20. Descriptive statistics were used to estimate the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Of self -medication. The chi-square test was used to compare the self-medication of the studied subjects by their characteristics. The level of statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. The logistic regression analyses were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% Cl) for the association of self-medication with the studied risk factors.
Ethical consideration
At the time of data collection, the interviewer read out the consent form and obtained informed written consent for each participant and no one will be obliged to fill the questionnaire.
RESULTS
To evaluate the prevalence and factors influencing self-medication, 367 subjects were studied. The following tables described the results.
Table 1 described the (age group, gender, marital status, education, occupation, family income, and residence, smoking, and physical activity). It showed that (48%) of the participants were less than 30 years, (37.6 %) of them were between 30 years and less than 40 years, (10.9 %) showed age between 40 years and less than 50 years and (3.5%) in age more than 50 years.
The females constituted (5 1 .5%) and males (48.5%). Most of the studied subjects were married (62.9%), (29.4%) were single, (4.9%) were divorced, and only (2.7%) were widows. (54.5%) had university and higher educational level, (34.9%) with secondary educational level, (7.9%) were intermediate educational level and only (2.7%) were illiterate. Regarding occupation, the majority were working (71 .9%). 38.4% reported monthly family income between 3,000 SR and 10,000 SR, (26.2%) less than 3,000 SR, (23.2%) between 10,000 SR and I 5,000 SR and only (1 2.3%) more than I 5,000 SR. (95.4%) of the subjects living in urban areas. (68.7%) of the studied subjects were nonsmoker, (22.9%) were smokers and only (8.4%) were ex-smoker. (53.1%) of the subject were not doing physical activity and (46.9%) were doing physical activity.
Table 2 reported Je self-medication use in I year among the studied participants, there were 274 subjects (74.7%) reported that they were used un-prescribed medication (self-medication). Out of that reported self-medication (n=274), 200 subjects (54.5%) have reported using the previously prescribed medication, 62 subjects (1 6.9%) were used self-medication from friends or family member recommendation, 41 subjects (1 I .2%) were used self-medication that Purchased over the counter at the pharmacy and 8 I subjects (22.1%) were used self-medication from pharmacist recommendation.
Out of that reported self-medication (n=274), 243 subjects (66.2%) were used self-medication for themselves, 23 subjects (6.3%) were used self-medication for their children, 6 subjects (1 .6%) were used self-medication for their wife's, 2 subjects (0.5%) were used self-medication for others. 173 self-medication users reported that they used self-medication to treat headache or body ache (47.1%), 67 from users used self- medication to treat flu/cough / cold (18.3%), 33 from users used self- medication for treat sore throat(9.0%), 32 from users used self- medication to treat fever (8.7%), 14 from users used self- medication to treat allergy and rashes (3.8%), 5 from users used self- medication for treat insomnia (1 .4%), only 2 from users used self- medication to treat diarrhea and only 2 from users used self- medication for the treatment of mouth ulcers (0.5%).The most common type of drugs used as self-medication from those who used ( n= 274), 202 subjects were used Antipyretics (55%), 188 subjects were used Analgesic (5 1 .2%), 76 subjects were used Decongestants (20.7%), 56 subjects were used Antibiotics (15.3%), 29 subjects were used Tonics/Vitamins (7.9%), 28 subjects were used Antihistaminic (7.6%), 13 subjects were used Antidiarrheal (3.5%), only 7 subjects were used Antiemetic (1 .9%) and only 7 subjects were used Sedatives (1.9%).
Table 3. described the self-medication variables (Frequency, Reasons, outcome, side effects) among users (n=274), 92 subjects were used self-medication one time per year (33.8%), 62 subjects were used self-medication twice per year (22.6%), 53 subjects were used self- medication three times per year (19.3%), 47 subjects were used self-medication four times per year (17.1%) and 20 subjects were used self-medication five times or more per year (7.2%).
The following reasons explain why users used self-medication (n=274), 130 subjects were used self-medication because of minor illness (47.4%), 42 subjects were used self-medication because of saving time &money (15.3%), 31 subjects were used self-medication because of avoiding crowding at PHC (11 .3%), 21 subjects were used self-medication because of previous good experience with the drug (7.7%), 15 subjects were used self-medication because of the high cost of consultations (5.5%), 12 subjects were used self-medication because of emergency (4.4%), 9 subjects were used self-medication because of privacy (3.3%), 8 subjects were used self- medication because of sufficient pharmacological knowledge (2.9%) and only 6 subjects were used self-medication because PHC is too far (2.2%). 203 of the users reported that there are no side effects after taking self- medication (74.2%), 40 of users reported that they had a headache after taking self- medication (14.6%) 14 of the users reported that they had a cough after taking self- medication (5.1%), 9 of the users reported that they had allergies/rash after taking self- medication (3.3%) and only 8 of the users reported that they had diarrhea/ vomiting after taking self- medication (2.9%).
The outcome of the users before used self-medication, 150 subjects thought they will improve if take self- medication (54.7%), 90 subjects thought they have not cured and not improved if take self- medication (32.9%) and 34 subjects thought they will be referred to clinic or hospital after taken self- medication (12.4%).
Table 4 preyed on the distribution of the studied subjects by self-medication and their socio-demographic characters. There have statistically significant differences between the (age group and residence), However, the use of self-medication was higher among those aged from less than 30years (79°/c), those older (30 < years (68.1°/c). and the use of self-medication was higher among those live in urban (73.7°/c). There have not been statistically significant differences between the studied subjects according to the use of self-medication, however, the use of self- medication subject those were female (75.1°/c) and those were male (74.2°/c). Married and single (74.5°/c), (75.9°/c), university and higher id secondary (74.0°/c) (77.3 professional workers (73.5°/c), low-income family 69.8°/c), the use of self-medication was also higher among nonsmoker subjects ( 7 I .8°/c) and the use of self-medication subject those were not doing physical activity(74.9°/c) and those were doing physical activity (74.4°/c).
Table 5 showed the distribution of the studied subjects by self-medication use and their knowledge about self-medication. Although not significant, the average level of good knowledge was low among users regarding the concept of self-medication (5 I .6°/c vs. 53.9°/c among non-user). The average level of good knowledge among users and non-users was comparable. The total average of good knowledge about self-medication was higher (24.3°/c) among users in comparison with that among non-users (18.9°/c), although not significant.
The most important source of knowledge among self-medication users was the mass media (9.1%), pharmacists (54.7%), previous consultation (21.5%), friends and relatives (23.0%), and health staff (8.7%). However, the pharmacist was the most common source of knowledge among non- users (54.7%) followed by the previous consultation (2 1.5%).
Table 6 showed the average of the general attitude of the studied subjects towards self-medication use. the average level of good attitude was high among subjects regarding the concept of self- medication (33.2%), the average level of low attitude among the subjects regarding the concept of self-medication (23.24%), however, the higher average level for those neutral to answer (43.74%)
Table 7 presented the risk factors associated with self-medication use among the studied 367 participants. The risk of self-medication was reduced significantly among subjects age more than 50 years (OR=0.30; 95Cl= 0.20-0.93), and the risk was found to increase three times among females compared to males, although not significant. However, the risk was reduced by 8°/c among married subjects (OR= 0.92), however, although not significant. The risk was increased significantly among the non-working subjects (OR= 1.25; 95% CI= 1 .05-2.85), the risk was highly increased by 30°/c among the monthly family income subjects with an (OR of 1.36), although it's not significant, the risk of self-medication was increased significantly among subjects residence rural (OR=5.70; 95%CI= 1.92-8.30).
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of studied participants |
|
Characteristics* |
N= 367 n (%). |
Age in years < 30 30- < 40 40-< 50 ≥ 50 |
176 (48.0) 138 (37.6) 40(10.9) 13 (3.5) |
Sex Male Female |
178 (48.5) 189 (51.5) |
Marital status Single Married Divorced Widow |
108 (29.4) 231 (62.9) 18 (4.9) 10 (2.7) |
Education Illiterate Intermediate Secondary University and higher |
10 (2.7) 29 (7.9) 128 (34.9) 200 (54.5) |
Occupation Do not work working |
103 (28.1) 264 (71.9) |
Family income in SR/month < 3000 3000-<10,000 10,000-< 15,000 ≥ 15,000 |
96(26.2) 141 (38.4) 85 (23.2) 45 (12.3) |
Residence Urban Rural |
350 (95.4) 17 (4.6) |
Smoking Non-smoker Smoker Ex-smoker |
252 (68.7) 84 (22.9) 31 (8.4) |
Physical activity Yes No |
172 (46.9) 195 (53.1) |
Table 2. Self-medication use in 1 year among the studied participants |
|
|
N= 367 |
Use of self-medication Yes No |
274 (74.7) 93 (25.3) |
Origin of self-medication* Previously prescribed Friends or family member recommendation Purchased by the patient over the counter at a pharmacy Pharmacist recommendation |
200 (54.5) 62 (16.9) 41 (11.2) 81 (22.1) |
For whom self-medication was used* Participant's himself Participants' children Your wife Others |
243 (66.2) 23 (6.3) 6 (1.6) 2 (0.5) |
The most common complaint about which self-medication was used* Headache/Body ache Flu/Cough/Cold Fever Allergies/Rash Sore throat Diarrhea Mouth ulcers Insomnia |
173 (47.1) 67 (18.3) 32 (8.7) 14 (3.8) 33 (9.0) 2 (0.5) 2 (0.5) 5 (1.4) |
Type of used in self-medication drugs* Antipyretics Decongestants Analgesic Antihistaminic Antibiotics Tonics/Vitamins Antidiarrheal Antiemetic Sedatives |
202 (55) 76 (20.7) 188 (51.2) 28 (7.6) 56 (15.3) 29 (7.9) 13 (3.5) 7 (1.9) 7 (1.9) |
* The number and percent of subjects using self-medication appeared to be more or less than 274 depending on the response of subjects' to studied checklist items.
|
Table 4. Distribution of self-medication among the studied subjects by their characteristics (n= 367) |
|||
Characteristics |
Self-medication |
P. value |
|
|
Yes N= 274 n (%) |
No N= 93 n (%) |
|
Age in years < 30 30- < 40 40- < 50 ≥ 50 |
139 (79) 94 (68.1) 34 (85.0) 7 (53.8) |
37 (21.0) 44 (31.9) 6 (15.0) 6 (46.2) |
0.01* |
Sex Male Female |
132 (74.2) 142 (75.1) |
46 (45.8) 47 (24.9) |
0.46 |
Marital status Single Married Divorced Widow |
82 (75.9) 172 (74.5) 14 (77.8) 6 (60.0) |
26 (24.1) 59 (25.5) 4 (22.2) 4 (40.0) |
0.72 |
Education Illiterate Intermediate Secondary University and higher |
7 (70.0) 20 (69.0) 99 (77.3) 148 (74.0) |
3 (30.0) 9 (31.0) 29 (22.7) 52 (26.0) |
0.76 |
Occupation Do not work Working |
80 (77.7) 194 (73.5) |
23 (22.3) 70 (26.5) |
0.24 |
Family income in SR/month < 3000 3000-<10,000 10,000-< 15,000 ≥ 15,000 |
67 (69.8) 107 (75.9) 68 (80.0) 32 (71.1) |
29 (30.2) 34 (24.1) 17 (20.0) 13 (28.9) |
0.40 |
Residence Urban Rural |
258 (73.7) 16 (94.1) |
92 (26.3) 1 (5.9) |
0.04* |
Smoking Non-smoker Smoker Ex-smoker |
181 (71.8) 66 (78.6) 27 (87.1) |
71 (28.2) 18 (21.4) 4 (12.9) |
0.09 |
Physical activity Yes No |
128 (74.4) 146 (74.9) |
44 (25.6) 49 (25.1) |
0.50 |
*Significantl
Table 5. Distribution of the studied subjects by self-medication use and their knowledge about self-medication (n= 367) |
|||
P-value |
Not self-medication use N = 93 n (%) |
Self-medication use N=274 n (%) |
Knowledge about self-medication |
0.10 |
56 (60.2) 12 (12.9) 25 (26.9) |
139 (50.7) 65 (23.8) 70 (25.5) |
Self-medication can be prevented by doctor communication Yes No Do not know |
0.56 |
52 (55.9) 22 (23.7) 19 (20.4) |
170 (62.0) 58 (21.2) 46 (16.8) |
Misuse of antibiotics increase body resistant to it Yes No Do not know |
0.28 |
48 (51.6) 14 (15.1) 31 (33.3) |
125 (45.6) 62 (22.6) 87 (31.8) |
The self-medication increases illness and death Yes No Do not know |
0.76 |
44 (47.3) 20 (21.5) 29 (31.2) |
122 (44.5) 69 (25.2) 83 (30.3) |
The self-medication increases hospital admission Yes No Do not know |
0.92 |
51 (54.8) 20 (21.5) 22 23.7) |
152 (55.5) 54 (19.7) 68 (24.8) |
The self-medication interferes with treatment and early detection Yes No Do not know |
0.08 |
45 (23.1) 10 (10.8) 14 (15.1) 3 (3.2) 13 (14.0) |
150 (54.7) 59 (21.5) 63 (23.0) 25 (9.1) 24 (8.7) |
Sources of self-medication information* Pharmacist Previous consultation Friends-Relatives Mass media Health staff |
*The number and percents of subjects using self-medication appeared to be more or less than 274 depending on the response of subjects' to studied checklist items.
Table 6. The general attitude of the studied subjects towards self-medication use |
|
|
N= 367 |
Self-medication is a quick alternative to consultation Agree Neutral Disagree |
148 (40.3) 158 (43.1) 61 (16.6) |
Self-medication reduce the load on doctors Agree Neutral Disagree |
128 (34.9) 168 (45.8) 71 (19.3) |
Self-medication leads to health problems Agree Neutral Disagree |
142 (38.7) 166 (45.2) 59 (16.1) |
Self-medication saves money and effort Agree Neutral Disagree |
129 (35.1) 154 (42.0) 84 (22.9) |
Self-medication prevented by health awareness Agree Neutral Disagree |
183 (49.9) 149 (40.6) 35 (9.5) |
Self-medication prevented by the legislation of regulation Agree Neutral Disagree |
188 (51.2) 142 (38.7) 37 (10.1) |
Self-medication prevented by the doctor-patient relationship Agree Neutral Disagree |
104 (28.3) 176 (48.0) 87 (23.7) |
Self-medication is safe Agree Neutral Disagree |
77 (21.0) 178 (48.5) 112 (30.5) |
Self-medication can cause addiction Agree Neutral Disagree |
134 (36.5) 164 (44.7) 69 (18.8) |
Self-medication interacts with other medications Agree Neutral Disagree |
168 (45.8) 150 (40.9) 49 (13.4) |
Table 7. Odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals for the association of self-medication with some studied factors |
||||
Risk factors |
Self-medication user N= 274 |
Not users N= 93 |
OR |
95% CI |
Age in years < 30 30- < 40 40- < 50 ≥ 50 |
139 94 34 7 |
37 44 6 6 |
1.00 0.56 1.50 0.30 |
Ref. 0.75-2.83 0.70-2.51 0.20-0.93* |
Sex Male Female |
132 142 |
46 47 |
1.00 1.05 |
Ref. 0.80-4.60 |
Marital status Single Married Divorced Widow |
82 172 14 6 |
26 59 4 4 |
1.00 0.92 1.10 0.47 |
Ref. 0.30-4.80 0.71-2.23 0.34-0.85 |
Education Illiterate Intermediate Secondary University and higher |
7 20 99 148 |
3 9 29 52 |
1.00 0.92 1.46 1.21 |
Ref. 0.12-2.78 0.86-2.09 0.58-3.60 |
Occupation Working Do not work |
194 80 |
70 23 |
1.00 1.25 |
Ref. 1.05-2.85* |
Family income in SR/month < 3000 3000-<10,000 10,000-< 15,000 ≥ 15,000 |
67 107 68 32 |
29 34 17 13 |
1.00 1.36 1.73 1.06 |
Ref. 0.20-3.25 0.35-5.21 0.74-9/85 |
Residence Urban Rural |
258 16 |
92 1 |
1.00 5.70 |
Ref. 1.92-8.30* |
Smoking Non-smoker Smoker Ex-smoker |
181 66 27 |
71 18 4 |
1.00 1.48 2.64 |
Ref. 1.10-3.21 1.43-7.41 |
DISCUSSION
Self-medication is a common phenomenon in the world and the unobserved use of drugs is a cause of concern. This study was conducted in Medina, Saudi Arabia to study the prevalence and factors influencing self-medication. The prevalence of self-medication use among the studied sample was 74.7%. Self-medication is common consumer practice in developing countries, and many prescriptions can be bought without a prescription [21, 30] A recent study in Saudi Arabia reported that up to 40% of patients attending primary care centers have "some" experience with self-medication [31]. Risk factors to self-medication were gender (male), below 50 years old, poor general condition, and dissatisfaction with health care [31]. A higher prevalence similar to that reported in our study was found in recent Saudi studies, where the reported prevalence of self-medication among the students at King Abdul-Aziz University was 75.2°/c [32], and among community pharmacy consumers in Central area was 5 I °/c [33].
The prevalence of self-medication was seen by up to 95% among adolescents [34]. In Bahrain, about 45% of medical students purchased antibiotics at least one time [35]. Minor illness time savings were the most common arguments. Self-medication in developing countries is more popular than other areas in the world as seen in Slovenia [36], Nigeria [37], Malaysia [38], and Egypt [39]. However, in developed countries, the main reason for self-medication is a high level of educational status [40]. In Saudia Arabia, it is common to purchase an OTC medication without a prescription. Self-medication prevalence was higher among those aged 40-<50 years old (85%) and among the rural population (94.1%) compared to (73.3%) among the urban population. The results also revealed that the prevalence was high among Divorced (77.8%) followed by a single (75.9%). A similar conclusion was seen in the Spanish study [41] showed that self-medication was more prevalent among persons lonely persons. Also, the high level of education was reported as a predictive factor reducing the risk of self-medication [40]. In contrast to the present results, the prevalence was higher among those have secondary education (77.3%) and University or more (74%). The most common drug category used by studied subjects were antipyretic (55.0%), analgesics (51.2%), and decongestants (20.7%). Headache and body aches (47.1%) and flu and cough (18.3%), were the most common indications for self-medication in our study as well as a recent study from India [42] and Ethiopia [40]. From the latter studies, fever was the commonest symptomatology associated with self-prescription. Nigerian study [37], reported diarrhea and gastrointestinal infections as the most common indication for self-medication and un-prescribed antibiotics use while common cold was the most common indication in Greece [43].
Although there was no significant difference among the studied subjects regarding the use of self-medication by their monthly family income levels, the higher rate (80°/c) was among those reported an income of 10,000-< I 5,000 SR per month. On the contrary, Awad et al. [44] found that the participants used pharmacies because they are of a lower cost compared to other health care facilities. This reflects that the problem of self-education among our subjects is not financial. The main reasons for self-medication among our subjects were minor illness (47.4%) and time-saving (15.3%). Also, studies from Brazil [45] and India [46] concluded that participants share the common sense of "time-saving" for using self-medication. This belief was seen also in studies from Bahrain [47]. This was similar to our findings where 31.5% of the studied subjects sought self-medication because of the high cost of the consultation. Although, there was no significant difference between the source of information and the use of self-medication. The main sources of information among users in this study were the pharmacist (54.7%), friends, and relatives (23%). Where is, the results from a recent Saudi study [48], including university’ students reported information gaining from physicians (50.6%), community pharmacists (15.7%), parents/adult relatives (7.2%), and internet (5.6%). Regarding the risk factors, the results of this study found a protective effect for the age among those having more than 50 years (OR=0.30; 95%CI= 0.20-0.93). It also showed that no significant difference in the risk of self-medication use and gender. On the other hand, however, the risk was increased among those having no work (OR 1 .25 95%Cl= 1.05 — 2.85). The risk was also increased among rural subjects (OR of 5.70 (95% CI= 1.92-8.30). Unlike this study, other similar studies did not calculate the risk of self-medication by these factors, but only reported a high proportion of self-medication among young and middle-aged persons, males, those who living alone and persons with low educational level[33, 39-43]. The present study has certain points of strength. The questionnaire addressed almost all items related to self-medication use. The questionnaire has been validated by two epidemiologists and a pharmacologist. Also, the interviewing questionnaire is superior to online surveys. However, this study has some limitations: being a cross-sectional study, its results should be re-enforced by more analytic studies like interventional studies. In conclusion, the results of this study revealed a considerable high proportion of self-medication among the Saudi population (74.7%) attending the primary health care centers in Medina city. The most common self-medication used by the studied sample was antipyretics. The study findings showed the effect of law that prohibits the purchasing of antibiotics without prescription indicating the importance of generalization of the prohibition of all drugs.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study revealed a considerable high proportion of self-medication among the Saudi population (74.7%) attending the primary health care centers in Medina city. The most common self-medication used by the studied sample was antipyretics. The study findings showed the effect of law that prohibits the purchasing of antibiotics without prescription indicating the importance of generalization of the prohibition of all drugs.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I thank all doctors in The Saudi Board of Preventive Medicine in Al medina Almunawwarah for their help and support and i would like to thank all subjects who participated in this study. Dr. Mujahid Mohammad Khoja, Dr. Manal Ali Al-Sharif, Dr. Somayah Hussain Sebeih, Dr. Nidhal Ibrahim Bahadir, Muhammad Ahmad Alsharif, Hassan Ayed Al-Sharif, Sami Salim eatia
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
REFERENCES
Copyright © 2024 - All Rights Reserved - Archives of Pharmacy Practice
Developed by Archives of Pharmacy Practice