Undergraduate endodontic education has experienced considerable variations in current years, inspired by variations in knowledge, methods, and materials as well as educational styles. It appears that the extra root canal treatments students operate on patients, the better their self‐efficacy is at graduation. Nevertheless, treating difficult cases may decrease their self‐efficacy and confidence. This is a cross-sectional study conducted among dental students in Riyadh using an online survey. Dental universities in Riyadh were contacted and participants were requested to fill up the survey. 500 students from clinical levels were utilized in this study. 73.1% of students reported the time spent on endodontic education being adequate, 69.5% considered the quality of lectures to be good and 23.2% reported that the lab's sessions do not have enough time. Statistically significant comparisons were observed when inquired about gender’s confidence in performing anterior RCT (p-value: .001), performing posterior RCT (p-value: .009), determining the restorability of the tooth (p-value: .001) Overall, the students are satisfied with the quality of endodontic education. However, the confidence levels are slightly above average, which does not complement their satisfaction from endodontic education.
1. Murray CM, Chandler NP. Undergraduate endodontic teaching in N ew Z ealand: Students’ experience, perceptions and self‐confidence levels. Aust Endod J. 2014;40(3):116-22.
2. Jungnickel L, Kruse C, Vaeth M, Kirkevang LL. Quality aspects of ex vivo root canal treatments done by undergraduate dental students using four different endodontic treatment systems. Acta Odontol Scand. 2018;76(3):169-74.
3. Gilmour AS, Welply A, Cowpe JG, Bullock AD, Jones RJ. The undergraduate preparation of dentists: Confidence levels of final year dental students at the School of Dentistry in Cardiff. Br Dent J. 2016;221(6):349-54.
4. Ali K, Slade A, Kay E, Zahra D, Tredwin C. Preparedness of undergraduate dental students in the United Kingdom: a national study. Br Dent J. 2017;222(6):472-7.
5. Davey J, Bryant ST, Dummer PM. The confidence of undergraduate dental students when performing root canal treatment and their perception of the quality of endodontic education. Eur J Dent Educ. 2015;19(4):229-34.
6. Tanalp J, Güven EP, Oktay I. Evaluation of dental students′ perception and self-confidence levels regarding endodontic treatment. Eur J Dent. 2013;7(02):218-24.
7. Baaij A, Özok AR, Vӕth M, Musaeus P, Kirkevang LL. Self‐efficacy of undergraduate dental students in Endodontics within Aarhus and Amsterdam. Int Endod J. 2020;53(2):276-84.
8. Luz LB, Grock CH, Oliveira VF, Bizarro L, Ardenghi TM, Ferreira MB, et al. Self‐reported confidence and anxiety over endodontic procedures in undergraduate students Quantitative and qualitative study. Eur J Dent Educ. 2019;23(4):482-90.
9. Haug SR, Linde BR, Christensen HQ, Vilhjalmsson VH, Bårdsen A. An investigation into security, self‐confidence and gender differences related to undergraduate education in Endodontics. Int Endod J. 2021;54(5):802-11.
10. Alrahabi M. The confidence of undergraduate dental students in Saudi Arabia in performing endodontic treatment. Eur J Dent. 2017;11(01):017-21.
11. Puryer J, Amin S, Turner M. Undergraduate confidence when undertaking root canal treatment and their perception of the quality of their endodontic education. Dent J. 2017;5(1):1.
12. Awooda EM, Mudathir MS, Mahmoud SA. Confidence level in performing endodontic treatment among final year undergraduate dental students from the University of Medical Science and Technology, Sudan (2014). Saudi Endod J. 2016;6(1):26.
Copyright © 2024 Archives of Pharmacy Practice. Authors retain copyright of their article if they are accepted for publication.
Developed by Archives of Pharmacy Practice
