Archive \ Volume.11 2020 Issue 1

Comparative Study Between Conventional Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) And Drug Eluting Bead TACE Regarding Tumour Response and Liver Function Tests

, , , ,
  1. Radiodiagnosis Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Sharkia, Egypt.
  2. Internal medicine department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Sharkia, Egypt.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare tumour response and liver function tests changes after conventional TACE with lipidol versus DEB-TACE in the treatment of non-resectable HCC. Patients and methods: Prospective non randomized comparative clinical trial was performed for patients receiving TACE at interventional radiology unit in Radiodiagnosis department in Zagazig university hospitals. Forty patients were included in this study, 16 patients were treated with drug eluting beads TACE and 24 patients were treated with conventional TACE. Results: Follow up triphasic CT was performed 1 month after the procedure, we found that complete response was 6 cases (25 %) in c TACE group, and 4 cases (25%) in drug eluting bead TACE group, Partial response was achieved in 11 cases (45.8%) in c TACE group, and in 8 cases (50 %) in DEBs-TACE group, Cases with stable disease were 5 cases (20.8%) in c TACE group, and it was 3 cases (18.7%) in DEBs-TACE group, progressive disease was noted in two cases (8.3 %) in c TACE group, and one case (6.2 %) in drug eluting TACE group. Mean albumin value in c TACE and DEBs TACE patients was averaged 3.5 and 3.6 gm/dl before treatment and   3.4  and 3.39 gm/dl after treatments, respectively. Mean value of total bilirubin in cTACE was averaged 1.6 mg/dl after treatment vs. 1.3mg/dl before treatment, whereas, in DEB TACE group reached 1.7 mg/dl after treatment  vs.1.36mg/dl before treatment. Mean value of ALT was 31 and 32 u/L in c TACE and DEB TACE groups respectively before treatment, it was 32 and 36 u/L in c TACE and DEB TACE groups respectively after treatment. Mean value of AST was 40 and 38 u/L in c TACE and DEB TACE groups respectively before treatment, it was 43 and 45 u/L in c TACE and DEB TACE groups respectively after treatment.  Conclusion: There were no significant differences between two groups regarding tumour response after 1 month. There was slight reduction in albumin level in post treatment groups, and there was elevation in total bilirubin, ALT and AST, however no significant difference was seen between two groups.



How to cite:
Vancouver
Elsheikh AM, Teama MI, Afify AF, Abowarda MH, N.Almassry H. Comparative Study Between Conventional Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) And Drug Eluting Bead TACE Regarding Tumour Response and Liver Function Tests. Arch Pharm Pract. 2020;11(1):153-62.
APA
Elsheikh, A. M., Teama, M. I., Afify, A. F., Abowarda, M. H., & N.Almassry, H. (2020). Comparative Study Between Conventional Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) And Drug Eluting Bead TACE Regarding Tumour Response and Liver Function Tests. Archives of Pharmacy Practice, 11(1), 153-162.

Download Citation
References
  1. Jemal A, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians.2011;61(2):69-90.
  2. European Association for Study of Liver, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2012; 48(5): 599-641.
  3. Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J: Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet, 2003; 362: 1907-17.
  4. Bruix J, Sherman M: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology, 2005; 42: 1208-36.
  5. Llovet JM, Bruix J: Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology, 2003; 37: 429-42.
  6. Bargellini I, Florio F, Golfieri R, Grosso M, Lauretti DL, Cioni R. Trends in utilization of transarterial treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a survey by the Italian society of interventional radiology. Cardiovascintervent Radiol. 2014; 37(2): 438-44.
  7. Lewis AL, Gonzalez MV, Leppard SW et al: Doxorubicin eluting beads: effects of drug loading on bead characteristics and drug distribution. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2007; 18: 1691-99.
  8. Li H, Wu F, Duan M, et al. Drug- eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) vs conventional TACE in treating hepatocellular carcinoma patients with multiple conventional TACE treatments history: A comparison of efficacy and safety.Medicine (2019)98:21.
  9. Ferrer Puchol MD, La Parra C, Esteban E, et al. Comparison of doxorubicin-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.Radiologia.2011; 53(3):246-253.
  10. Malenstein H, Maleux G, Vandecaveye V,et al. A randomized phase II study of drug-eluting beads versus transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Onkologie 2011;34:368-376.
  11. Song JE and Kim DY. Conventional vs drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2017 june 28;9(18): 808-814.
  12. Kohla MAS, Abu Zeid MI, Al-Warraky M, et al. Predictors of hepatic decompensation after TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma. BMJ open Gastro 2015;2:e000032.doi:10.1136/bmjgast-2015-000032.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.