Archive \ Volume.16 2025 Issue 1

From Medication Alerts to Medication Sensemaking in Hospital Pharmacy

, ,
  1. Department of Hospital Pharmacy and Clinical Alerts, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  2. Department of Medication Sensemaking and Informatics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.

Abstract

Medication-related clinical decision support is commonly designed to detect potentially hazardous prescriptions, interactions, doses, monitoring gaps, or patient–drug mismatches. Detection, however, does not establish that an alert is valid, clinically relevant, sufficiently contextualized, understood by the appropriate professional, or translated into a defensible medication decision. This article develops an original Medication-Sensemaking Model for hospital pharmacy. The model distinguishes signal production from the collaborative construction of meaning and positions alerts as inputs to professional reasoning rather than completed decisions. It proposes a sequence comprising signal-validity assessment, patient–drug–workflow context assembly, relevance adjudication, uncertainty appraisal, rationale formation, collaborative interpretation, action or monitored deferral, escalation, and governance feedback. Human and digital contributions are treated as interdependent but non-equivalent: computational systems may identify patterns and retrieve information, whereas professional authority, accountability, contextual judgment, and responsibility for escalation remain organizationally assigned. Evaluation should therefore extend beyond alert frequency, acceptance, and override rates to include contextual completeness, rationale quality, medication-task performance, workflow consequences, safety, equity, escalation reliability, generalizability, and lifecycle governance. The model is an evidence-informed conceptual synthesis rather than a validated clinical pathway. Its components, transition rules, and escalation boundaries require prospective testing across alert classes, professional configurations, patient populations, and hospital infrastructures. The principal contribution is a structured account of how hospital pharmacy may move from detecting medication signals toward constructing reviewable, uncertainty-aware, and collaboratively actionable medication meaning without equating automation with professional judgment or technical performance with clinical benefit.


Downloads: 23
Views: 108

How to cite:
Vancouver
Silva J, Costa P, Beatriz A. From Medication Alerts to Medication Sensemaking in Hospital Pharmacy. Arch Pharm Pract. 2025;16(1):60-8. https://doi.org/10.51847/9RIvyEeOnR
APA
Silva, J., Costa, P., & Beatriz, A. (2025). From Medication Alerts to Medication Sensemaking in Hospital Pharmacy. Archives of Pharmacy Practice, 16(1), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.51847/9RIvyEeOnR

Download Citation
References
  1. Ancker JS, Edwards A, Nosal S, Hauser D, Mauer E, Kaushal R, et al. Effects of workload, work complexity, and repeated alerts on alert fatigue in a clinical decision support system. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17(1):36. doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0430-8
  2. Co Z, Holmgren AJ, Classen DC, Newmark L, Seger DL, Danforth M, et al. The tradeoffs between safety and alert fatigue: Data from a national evaluation of hospital medication-related clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(8):1252-8. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa098
  3. Hussain MI, Reynolds TL, Zheng K. Medication safety alert fatigue may be reduced via interaction design and clinical role tailoring: A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019;26(10):1141-9. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocz095
  4. Van Dort BA, Zheng WY, Sundar V, Baysari MT. Optimizing clinical decision support alerts in electronic medical records: A systematic review of reported strategies adopted by hospitals. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(1):177-83. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa279
  5. Leykum LK, O’Leary K. Web Exclusives. Annals for Hospitalists Inpatient Notes—Sensemaking—fostering a shared understanding in clinical teams. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(4). doi:10.7326/M17-1829
  6. Cook DA, Teixeira MT, Heale BSE, Cimino JJ, Del Fiol G. Context-sensitive decision support (infobuttons) in electronic health records: A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(2):460-8. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocw104
  7. Wright A, Ai A, Ash J, Wiesen JF, Hickman TT, Aaron S, et al. Clinical decision support alert malfunctions: Analysis and empirically derived taxonomy. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25(5):496-506. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocx106
  8. Murad DA, Tsugawa Y, Elashoff DA, Baldwin KM, Bell DS. Distinct components of alert fatigue in physicians’ responses to a noninterruptive clinical decision support alert. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023;30(1):64-72. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac191
  9. Sutton RT, Pincock D, Baumgart DC, Sadowski DC, Fedorak RN, Kroeker KI. An overview of clinical decision support systems: Benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digit Med. 2020;3:17. doi:10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y
  10. Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Lynch J, Hughes G, A’Court C, et al. Beyond adoption: A new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(11). doi:10.2196/jmir.8775
  11. Salwei ME, Hoonakker P, Carayon P, Wiegmann D, Pulia M, Patterson BW. Usability of a human factors-based clinical decision support in the emergency department: Lessons learned for design and implementation. Hum Factors. 2024;66(3):647-57. doi:10.1177/00187208221078625
  12. Romero-Brufau S, Wyatt KD, Boyum P, Mickelson M, Moore M, Cognetta-Rieke C. A lesson in implementation: A pre-post study of providers’ experience with artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support. Int J Med Inform. 2020;137:104072. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104072
  13. Bauer J, Busse M, Koch S, Schmid M, Sommer J, Fromm MF, et al. Clinical-pharmaceutical assessment of medication CDSS alerts: Content appropriateness and patient relevance in clinical practice. Front Pharmacol. 2025;16:1510425. doi:10.3389/fphar.2025.1510425
  14. Shah SN, Amato MG, Garlo KG, Seger DL, Bates DW. Renal medication-related clinical decision support (CDS) alerts and overrides in the inpatient setting following implementation of a commercial electronic health record: Implications for designing more effective alerts. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(6):1081-7. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa222
  15. Edrees H, Amato MG, Wong A, Seger DL, Bates DW. High-priority drug-drug interaction clinical decision support overrides in a newly implemented commercial computerized provider order-entry system: Override appropriateness and adverse drug events. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(6):893-900. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa034
  16. Nguyen JQ, Crews KR, Moore BT, Kornegay NM, Baker DK, Hasan M, et al. Clinician adherence to pharmacogenomics prescribing recommendations in clinical decision support alerts. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023;30(1):132-8. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac187
  17. Wright A, McEvoy DS, Aaron S, McCoy AB, Amato MG, Kim H, et al. Structured override reasons for drug-drug interaction alerts in electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019;26(10):934-42. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocz033
  18. Liu S, McCoy AB, Wright AP, Nelson SD, Huang SS, Ahmad HB, et al. Why do users override alerts? Utilizing large language model to summarize comments and optimize clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024;31(6):1388-96. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocae041
  19. Tschandl P, Rinner C, Apalla Z, Argenziano G, Codella N, Halpern A, et al. Human-computer collaboration for skin cancer recognition. Nat Med. 2020;26(8):1229-34. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0942-0
  20. Alingh CW, van Wijngaarden JDH, van de Voorde K, Paauwe J, Huijsman R. Speaking up about patient safety concerns: The influence of safety management approaches and climate on nurses’ willingness to speak up. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(1):39-48. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007163
  21. Markus AF, Kors JA, Rijnbeek PR. The role of explainability in creating trustworthy artificial intelligence for health care: A comprehensive survey of the terminology, design choices, and evaluation strategies. J Biomed Inform. 2021;113:103655. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103655
  22. Cresswell K, Rigby M, Magrabi F, Scott P, Brender J, Craven CK, et al. The need to strengthen the evaluation of the impact of artificial intelligence-based decision support systems on healthcare provision. Health Policy. 2023;136:104889. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104889
  23. Vasey B, Nagendran M, Campbell B, Clifton DA, Collins GS, Denaxas S, et al. Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI. Nat Med. 2022;28(5):924-33. doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01772-9
  24. Liu X, Cruz Rivera S, Moher D, Calvert MJ, Denniston AK; SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Working Group. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: The CONSORT-AI extension. Nat Med. 2020;26(9):1364-74. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-1034-x
  25. Graafsma J, Murphy RM, van de Garde EMW, Karapinar-Çarkit F, Derijks HJ, Hoge RHL, et al. The use of artificial intelligence to optimize medication alerts generated by clinical decision support systems: A scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024;31(6):1411-22. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocae076
  26. Chen CY, Chen YL, Scholl J, Yang HC, Li YCJ. Ability of machine-learning-based clinical decision support system to reduce alert fatigue, wrong-drug errors, and alert users about look alike, sound alike medication. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024;243:107869. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107869
  27. Robert L, Vidoni N, Gérard E, Chazard E, Odou P, Rousselière C, et al. Implementation of a clinical decision support system for the optimization of antidiabetic drug orders by pharmacists. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024;90(1):239-46. doi:10.1111/bcp.15898
  28. Labkoff S, Oladimeji B, Kannry J, Solomonides A, Leftwich R, Koski E, et al. Toward a responsible future: Recommendations for AI-enabled clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024;31(11):2730-9. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocae209
  29. Kelly CJ, Karthikesalingam A, Suleyman M, Corrado G, King D. Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):195. doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1426-2
  30. Wiens J, Saria S, Sendak M, Ghassemi M, Liu VX, Doshi-Velez F, et al. Do no harm: A roadmap for responsible machine learning for health care. Nat Med. 2019;25(9):1337-40. doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0548-6
  31. Ghassemi M, Oakden-Rayner L, Beam AL. The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care. Lancet Digit Health. 2021;3(11). doi:10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00208-9
  32. Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019;366(6464):447-53. doi:10.1126/science.aax2342

 

 

 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.