Archive \ Volume.15 2024 Issue 2

Gender Differences in Paraphilic Sexual Interest in Women and Men

Cristian Delcea*✉
  1. Department of Advanced Studies in Sexology, Sexology Institute of Romania, Romania.

Abstract

The present paper aims to highlight potential gender differences in paraphilic interest in women and men. Thus, paraphilic interests such as sexual sadism, sexual masochism, fetishism, and urophilia were targeted. The study was started in the period between 2022-2023, during which a sample of 224 participants of woman and man was selected of which 108 men and 116 women aged between 18 and 48 years. The data were collected with the Questionnaire on paraphilic disorders by accessing the participation link or by scanning a QR code with mobile phones in compliance with the norms of ethics and deontology. The obtained results indicated the existence of significant gender differences in terms of paraphilic-type interests. Men showed a significantly higher interest in sexual interests such as sexual sadism and urophilia. By comparison, women presented significantly higher sexual interests than men in terms of masochistic interests. Regarding fetishist interest, no significant gender differences were identified.


Downloads: 28
Views: 75

How to cite:
Vancouver
Delcea C. Gender Differences in Paraphilic Sexual Interest in Women and Men. Arch Pharm Pract. 2024;15(2):64-8. https://doi.org/10.51847/7f2KMGLfKd
APA
Delcea, C. (2024). Gender Differences in Paraphilic Sexual Interest in Women and Men. Archives of Pharmacy Practice, 15(2), 64-68. https://doi.org/10.51847/7f2KMGLfKd

Download Citation
References
  1. Ogas O, Gaddam S. A billion wicked thoughts: What the world's largest experiment reveals about human desire. Dutton/Penguin Books; 2011.
  2. Levaque E, Dawson SJ, Wan C, Lalumière ML. Sex drive as a possible mediator of the gender difference in the prevalence of paraphilic interests in a nonclinical sample. Arch Sex Behav. 2022;51(2):867-77. doi:10.1007/s10508-021-02074-w
  3. Knight RA, Du R. The structure, covariates, and etiology of hypersexuality: Implications for sexual offending. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2021;23(8):50. doi:10.1007/s11920-021-01260-w
  4. Giredea C. Klismaphilia - Short review. Int J Adv Stud Sexol. 2019;1(2):89-90. doi:10.46388/ijass.2019.12.11.126
  5. Bogdan MM. Clinical comorbidity - Short review. Int J Adv Stud Sexol. 2019;1(2):91-2. doi:10.46388/ijass.2019.12.11.127
  6. Chirilă VI. Coprophilia - Short review. Int J Adv Stud Sexol. 2019;1(2):93-4. doi:10.46388/ijass.2019.12.11.128
  7. Bogdan MM. Exhibitionism- Short review. Int J Adv Stud Sexol. 2019;1(2):95-6. doi:10.46388/ijass.2019.12.11.129
  8. Bogdan MM. Fetishism. Int J Adv Stud Sexol. 2019;1(2):97-8.
  9. Chirilă VI. Frotteurism - Short review. Int J Adv Stud Sexol. 2019;1(2):99-100. doi:10.46388/ijass.2019.12.11.131
  10. Chirilă VI. Hebephilia - Short review. Int J Adv Stud Sexol. 2019:101-2. doi:10.46388/ijass.2019.12.11.132
  11. Marchiș MD. Sexual sadism disorder. Int J Adv Stud Sexol. 2019;1(2):105-6.
  12. Giredea C. Telephone scatalogy. Int J Adv Stud Sexol. 2019;1(2):107-8.
  13. Stan CI. Frotteuristic disorder. An individual psychology approach. Int J Adv Stud Sexol. 2020;2(1):15-9.
  14. Kabiry DM. Objectum sexuality or objectophilia. Int J Adv Stud Sexol. 2020;2(1). doi:10.46388/ijass.2020.13.14
  15. Lescai EF. The transvestic disorder. An individual psychology approach. Int J Adv Stud Sexol. 2020;2(1):25-31.
  16. Mirică I. Paraphilias and paraphilic behaviors. Voaiorismul. Int J Adv Stud Sexol. 2020;2(1). doi:10.46388/ijass.2020.13.19
  17. Delcea C. Construction, validation, and standardization of the sexual S-On application. Int J Sex Health. 2022;34:196-9. doi:10.1080/19317611.2022.2017618
  18. Siserman C, Giredea C, Delcea C. The comorbidity of paraphilic disorders and rape in individuals incarcerated for sexual offences. Rom J Leg Med. 2020;28(3):278-82. doi:10.4323/rjlm.2020.X
  19. Delcea C, Siserman C. Validation and standardization of the questionnaire for evaluation of paraphilic disorders. Rom J Leg Med. 2020;28(1):14-20. doi:10.4323/rjlm.2020.14
  20. Delcea C, Chirilă IV, Săuchea MA. Effects of COVID-19 on the people’s sexual life - Meta-Analysis. Sexologies. 2021;30(1):e49-54. doi:10.1016/j.sexol.2020.12.001
  21. Gherman C, Enache A, Delcea C. The multi-factorial determinism of forensic expertise regarding sentence interruption on medical grounds and decision. J Forensic Leg Med. 2019;61:45-5. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2018.10.005
  22. Siserman CV. Frotteurism disorder. Int J Adv Stud Sexol. 2021;3(2):101. doi:10.46388/ijass.2021.13.43
  23. Turban JL, Shirk SD, Potenza MN, Hoff RA, Kraus SW. Posting Sexually explicit images or videos of oneself online is associated with impulsivity and hypersexuality but not measures of psychopathology in a sample of US veterans. J Sex Med. 2020;17(1):163-7. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.09.018
  24. Davis KA, Knight RA. The relation of childhood abuse experiences to problematic sexual behaviors in male youths who have sexually offended. Arch Sex Behav. 2019;48(7):2149-69. doi:10.1007/s10508-018-1279-3
  25. Morais HB, Alexander AA, Fix RL, Burkhart BR. Childhood sexual abuse in adolescents adjudicated for sexual offenses: Mental health consequences and sexual offending behaviors. Sex Abuse. 2018;30(1):23-42. doi:10.1177/1079063215625224

 

 


Related articles:
Most viewed articles:
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.