Archive \ Volume.15 2024 Issue 1

Investigating Common and Effective Teaching Methods in Continuing Medical Education: A Review Study

Dan Alexandru Tătaru , Mihaela Gabriela Bonțea*✉ , Claudiu Matei , Călin Buzlea
  1. Department of Interventional Cardiology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  2. Department of Interventional Cardiology, Cluj County Emergency Hospital, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  3. Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania.
  4. Faculty of Medicine, “Lucian Blaga” University, Sibiu, Romania.
  5. Department of Urology, County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Oradea, Oradea, Romania.

Abstract

Given that medical science is always advancing, continuing education programs are designed to ensure that all practitioners in the medical and healthcare professions are updated with new developments. According to the issues raised, the present study has been conducted to review the common and effective educational methods in the subjects of continuous education to introduce effective methods to increase sustainable learning and effective education. This study is a review type and was conducted during the years 2000-2023 through searching articles in databases: Google Scholar, Elsevier ISI (Web of Science), and Scopus. The search was conducted using the keywords: “Educational Method”, “Continuing education”, and “Common Method of Teaching”. The results have shown that one of the most important factors influencing continuous education is teaching methods and teaching methods. So the importance of teaching methods in the continuous education programs of doctors has been emphasized in several researches. Considering that the role of new teaching methods in the effectiveness of learning during healthcare activities cannot be ignored, common methods in medical science education along with new methods are one of the effective approaches in sustainable learning among employees. Using this method, sustainable learning will encourage people to continue and carry out correct healthcare and treatment and will create sustainable performance. In addition to lectures, effective educational methods such as group discussion, problem-solving methods, cooperative educational models, clinical education, e-learning, simulation-based medical education, and evidence-based medicine can be used.


Downloads: 97
Views: 139

How to cite:
Vancouver
Tătaru DA, Bonțea MG, Matei C, Buzlea C. Investigating Common and Effective Teaching Methods in Continuing Medical Education: A Review Study. Arch Pharm Pract. 2024;15(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.51847/pGml55AJA0
APA
Tătaru, D. A., Bonțea, M. G., Matei, C., & Buzlea, C. (2024). Investigating Common and Effective Teaching Methods in Continuing Medical Education: A Review Study. Archives of Pharmacy Practice, 15(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.51847/pGml55AJA0

Download Citation
References
  1. Mokhtari Nouri J, Ebadi A, Alhani F, Rejeh N. Importance of role-model teaching in nursing students’ education. Educ Strategies MedSci. 2011;3(4):149-54.
  2. Masoumy M, Ebadi A, Daneshmandi M, Raisifar A. Concept mapping; Modern teaching strategy in nursing education. IJER. 2011;4(1):47-51.
  3. Fox RD, Bennett NL. Continuing medical education: Learning and change: Implications for continuing medical education. Bmj. 1998;316(7129):466.
  4. Yaman H. Continuing medical education in Turkey: Recent developments. BMC Med Educ. 2002;2(1):1-5.
  5. Mohammadimehr M, Fathi Vajargah K. Hidden curriculum in continuous medical education. Educ Strategies Med Sci. 2008;1(1):48-53.
  6. Genc A, Isler SC, Oge AE, Matur Z. Effect of sagittal split osteotomy with Medpor® porous polyethylene implant on masticatory reflex. Ann Dent Spec. 2022;10(3):12.
  7. Herrera CA, Olivos T, Roman JA, Larraín A, Pizarro M, Solis N, et al. Evaluation of the educational environment in medical specialty programs. Rev Med Chil. 2012;140(12):1554-61.
  8. Valverde LF, Rosas-Nexticapa M, Alvarez-Ramirez M, Lopez-Ramos M, Mateu-Armand V. Theoretical evaluation of interaction of some dibenzo derivatives on both androgen receptor and 5a-reductase enzyme. Clin Cancer Investig J. 2022;11(5):11-6.
  9. Ebadi A, Vanaki Z, Nahrir B, Hekmatpou D. Pathology of continuing educational programs in Iran medical society. Stride Dev Med Educ. 2008;4(2):140-5.
  10. Abdelmuhsin AA, Alghamdi AA, Ibrahim NA. Assessing the phenotypic and genotypic variations of Plantago ciliata in Ha’il region, Saudi Arabia. Entomol Appl Sci Let. 2021;1:14-22.
  11. Adler G, Pritchett LR, Kauth MR. Meeting the continuing education needs of rural mental health providers. Telemed e-Health. 2013;19(11):852-6.
  12. AlHussain BS, AlFantoukh MA, Alasmari KM, AlHrab FA, Alotaibi FA, Alaybani WH, et al. Clinical knowledge of orthodontics complication and emergencies among interns and dentists in Riyadh city. Ann Dent Spec. 2022;10(2):45-51.
  13. Manning PR, Petit DW. The past, present, and future of continuing medical education: Achievements and opportunities, computers and recertification. JAMA. 1987;258(24):3542-6.
  14. Abbatt FR, Mejía A. Continuing the education of health workers. A workshop manual. WHO Publications Center USA, 49 Sheridan Avenue, Albany, NY 12210; 1988.
  15. Nath SG, Raveendran R, Perumbure S. Artificial intelligence and its application in the early detection of oral cancers. Clin Cancer Investig J. 2022;11(1):5-9.
  16. Shakurnia A, Elhampour H, Marashi T, Heidari Soureshjani Sh. Concordance of length and contents of continuing medical education programs with educational demands of practicing GPs in Khuzestan province. Iran J Med Educ. 2007;7(1):85-91.
  17. Aljulayfi IS, Almatrafi A, Alharbi AR, Aldibas AO, AlNajei AA. The influence of replacing anterior teeth on patient acceptance of removable partial dentures in Saudi Arabia. Ann Dent Spec. 2022;10(2):5.
  18. Sadeghi M, Bakhshi H. The viewpoints of general dentists of Rafsanjan and Kerman toward continuing education program of restorative dentistry. Iran J Med Educ. 2008;8(1):63-70.
  19. Hosseini SJ, AA A. Review of medical community education in world countries. InJournal of Tehran Medical School, Special Letter from the Fourth Medical Education Conference 2000 (Vol. 3).
  20. Cinkir H, Kus T, Aktas G, Elboga U. Sarcopenia is a predictive marker for response to erlotinib in patients with lung adenocancer. Clin Cancer Investig J. 2021;10(6):294-9.
  21. Peck C, McCall M, McLaren B, Rotem T. Continuing medical education and continuing professional development: International comparisons. Bmj. 2000;320(7232):432-5.
  22. Hosseini SJ. The status of continuing medical education in Iran. Res Educ. 1998;3(1):44-7.
  23. Makarem A, Emadzadeh A, Amirchaghmaghi M. A comparative study of the continuing dental education in Iran and other countries in the world. J Mashhad Dent Sch. 2017;41(4):339-56.
  24. Ahmadijouybary T, Almasi A, Ataie M, Moosazadeh M, Moradinazar M, Aghaei I. Survey the effect of two educational methods of work shop and speech in increasing the awareness level of general practitioner in continuing education programs in Kermanshah City. Res Med Educ. 2012;4(2):47-52.
  25. Karimi Monaghi H, Rad M, Bakhshi M. Do the new methods of teaching in medical education have adequate efficacy? A systematic review. Stride Dev Med Educ. 2013;10(2):271-80.
  26. Baghcheghi N, Mountain H, Rezaie K. Effect of lecture and group discussion method of teaching communication skills with patients in nursing. Iran J Med Educ. 2010;10(3):211-8.
  27. Javadi M, Kargar A, Gholami K, Hadjibabaie M, Rashidian A, Torkamandi H, et al. Didactic lecture versus interactive workshop for continuing pharmacy education on reproductive health: A randomized controlled trial. Eval Health Prof. 2015;38(3):404-18.
  28. Khaledi Sh, Moridi G, Shafieyan M, Gharibi F. Comparison of Combination of three methods of teaching and lecture on learning and sustained learning of nursing students. Dena Quarterly J. 2010;5(3,4):19-20.
  29. Fattahi Bafghi A, Karimi H, Anvari MH, Barzegar K. Comparison of the effectiveness of two teaching methods of group discussion and lecturing in learning rate of laboratory medicine students. Strides in Dev Med Educ. 2007;4(1):51-6.
  30. Azadbakht L, Haghighatdoost F, Esmaillzadeh A. Comparing the effect of teaching based on problem-solving method versus lecturing method regarding first diet therapy course for students of nutritional science. Iran J Med Educ. 2011;10(5):1093-101.
  31. Kakoei S, Sajjadi F, Shahabinejad M, Kakooei S. The viewpoints of dentists toward continuing dental education. Iran J Med Educ. 2014;13(11):897-906.
  32. Kousha A, Khoshnevis P, Sadeghzadeh M, Kazemi N, Nourian A, Mousavinasab N. General physicians' viewpoints on continuing education programs in Zanjan province. Iran J Med Educ. 2011;11(2):165-6.
  33. Butterworth K, Zimmerman M, Hayes B, Noble S. Needs assessment for continuing medical education amongst doctors working in rural Nepal. South East Asian J Med Educ. 2010;4(1):34-42.
  34. Yousefy A, Rezaie A. Continuing medical education (CME): A basis for quality improvement of health services. IJME. 2001;1(1):8-14.
  35. Borji A, Imani M, Moradi A. The study of general practitioners’ views on the content of composed programs in Zahedan. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2004;6(2):145-51.
  36. Arash A, Hesari Z, Alizadeh S, Broomand N. General practitioners assessment of continuing education programs in Golestan university of medical sciences. Res Med Educ. 2016;7(4):64-70.
  37. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME: A review of 50 randomized controlled trials. Jama. 1992;268(9):1111-7.
  38. Safa AH, Kheirandish M, Zare S, Asghari N, Safa H. Viewpoints of Bandar Abbas general practitioners on continuing medical education (CME) programs. Hormozgan Med J. 2006;10(2):173-7.
  39. Ataei M, Saffarian-Hamedani S, Zameni F. Effective teaching model in continuing medical education programs. J Mazandaran Uni Med Sci. 2019;29(176):202-7.
  40. Hosseini G, Shamelyan N. Revision of continuing education programs. InTehran University Medical Journal. Fourth National Conference on Medical Education 2000 (pp. 153-154).
  41. Zahed PY, Kanani JG. A survey on tile opinions of participators about CME in Babol university of medical sciences 2000. Teb Va Tazkieh. 2001;(42):18-23.
  42. Anbari Z. Study the factors of establishing motivation in general physicians in order to enter into continuous education programs in Arak University of Medical Sciences in 2002. J Arak Uni Med Sci. 2002;5(2):20-3.
  43. Genghiz T, Mirshamsi M, Afshinya F, Daneshvar P, Shams B. MM Esfahan physicians' view of the content and practices of continuing education programs. J Esfahan Med Sch. 2000;156.
  44. Delors J. Learning: The treasure within. Unesco; 1998.
  45. Haghani F, Shariatmadari A, Naderi E, Yousefi A. Teaching methods used by general practitioners’ continuing education programs in Isfahan University of medical sciences. Iran J Med Educ. 2003;3(2):15-21.
  46. Mehrmohammadi M, Abedi L. The nature of teaching and its aesthetic dimensions. Qtly J Teach. 2001;5(3):43-57.
  47. Roter D, Rosenbaum J, de Negri B, Renaud D, DiPrete-Brown L, Hernandez O. The effects of a continuing medical education programme in interpersonal communication skills on doctor practice and patient satisfaction in Trinidad and Tobago. Med Educ. 1998;32(2):181-9.
 

Related articles:
Novichok Toxicology: A Review Study
Issue 3 Vol 14, 2023 | Florica Voiţă-Mekereş
Most viewed articles:
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.