Archive \ Volume.15 2024 Issue 4

Investigation of the Effect of Topinambur Extract on Cholesterol Levels

, , , , , , ,
  1. Department of Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Stavropol State Medical University, Stavropol, Russia.
  2. Department of Therapy, Pediatric Faculty, North Ossetian State Medical Academy, Vladikavkaz, Russia.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the impact of concentrated topinambur extract (CTE) on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) levels in individuals suffering from atherogenic dyslipidemia. The control group adhered to a standard low-calorie diet throughout the treatment period. Meanwhile, the main group followed a modified version of the same diet, incorporating 100 mL of CTE. Our research into the use of CTE in treating dyslipidemia yielded valuable data. The findings indicate that this treatment option is well-tolerated and comparable to standard diet therapy in terms of weight loss. Moreover, we observed a positive impact on blood lipid profile. There was a statistically significant reduction in LDLC levels, while HDLC remained unchanged. This suggests a targeted effect on cholesterol levels without compromising overall cardiovascular health. Furthermore, there were no changes in liver function markers such as aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), creatinine, or uric acid among patients receiving CTE.


Downloads: 216
Views: 409

How to cite:
Vancouver
Shahova AS, Chmutov EY, Shkhanokova AR, Cherevatov NV, Kokozova AE, Isaldibirova AV, et al. Investigation of the Effect of Topinambur Extract on Cholesterol Levels. Arch Pharm Pract. 2024;15(4):53-7. https://doi.org/10.51847/DVe6FN5cVU
APA
Shahova, A. S., Chmutov, E. Y., Shkhanokova, A. R., Cherevatov, N. V., Kokozova, A. E., Isaldibirova, A. V., Oganyan, S. V., & Elmurzaev, I. I. (2024). Investigation of the Effect of Topinambur Extract on Cholesterol Levels. Archives of Pharmacy Practice, 15(4), 53-57. https://doi.org/10.51847/DVe6FN5cVU

Download Citation
Keywords: Diet, Atherogenic dyslipidemia, Cholesterol, Topinambur

INTRODUCTION

Every year in Europe, more than 4 million people die from cardiovascular diseases (CVD) [1]. Most of these diseases are of atherosclerotic origin [2]. For instance, mortality from CVD diseases in the Russian Federation in 2023 amounted to 624.5 cases per 100 thousand population [3].

The development of CVD is associated with risk factors (RF), among which there are modifiable (changeable) and unmodified (immutable) [4]. In turn, the basis for the prevention of CVD of atherosclerotic genesis are healthy lifestyle and diagnosis of RF such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) and blood pressure (BP), as well as normalization of body weight [5]. Atherogenic dyslipidemia (hyperlipidemia) includes a triad of metabolic disorders: an increased concentration of LDLC in the blood, a decrease in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol HDLC, an increase in triglycerides (TG) [6, 7].

A special place is occupied by the residual risk of cardiovascular complications in patients receiving optimal statin therapy. This is fair for a group of patients that can not achieve the target values of LDLC, despite therapy with the maximum dose of statins and other drugs [8]. Most often, such residual dyslipidemia occurs among patients with obesity or overweight [9, 10]. This is associated not only with the presence of gross metabolic disorders but also with factors limiting the use of maximum doses of statins, such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and steatohepatitis [11].

Among patients receiving optimal statin therapy, a special focus is on the residual risk of cardiovascular complications. This group of patients fails to achieve the target values of LDLC despite treatment with the maximum dose of statins and other medications [8]. Residual dyslipidemia is most prevalent among individuals with obesity or overweight [9, 10]. This is attributed not only to severe metabolic disorders but also to factors that limit the use of maximum doses of statins, such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and steatohepatitis [12, 13]. This group of patients requires innovative strategies to enhance the efficacy of lipid-lowering treatment [14]. Among these strategies, non-pharmacological interventions, particularly dietary modifications, hold significant promise [15, 16]. It has been proven that against the background of complex therapy with a change in diet, it is possible to achieve a significant decrease in the content of atherogenic lipids or eliminate the causes that prevent the appointment of maximum doses of drugs [17].

Numerous studies show pronounced changes in LDLC levels in response to diet therapy and the use of medications [18, 19]. These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive treatment approaches that combine lifestyle modifications, such as dietary changes, with pharmacological interventions [20]. However, despite the availability of effective treatments, a significant proportion of patients still struggle to achieve optimal lipid profiles [20]. This underscores the need for further research into alternative strategies that can help address residual dyslipidemia and reduce cardiovascular risk in these individuals Thus, in the complex of measures aimed at the treatment of this category of patients, the first place belongs to the search for new methods of dietary reduction of atherogenic dyslipidemia.

Concentrated topinambur extract (CTE) contains inulin, vitamins B1-B12, E, P, and H, as well as amino acids, micro- and macronutrients, and natural sugars [21, 22]. Taking into account the composition of the CTE, it seems advisable to study its effects within the framework of a controlled study. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effect of inclusion in the diet of CTE on the level of atherogenic lipids in patients with dyslipidemia [21-23]. This approach would allow for a comprehensive evaluation of the potential benefits and risks associated with the use of CTE. The results of such a study could contribute to the development of more effective and safe treatment options for patients with dyslipidemia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients were divided into experimental and control groups as presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Characteristics of the participants selected for the study.

Index

Groups

Experimental

Control

Number of patients

20

20

Average age, years (М±SD)

57.5±3.5

56.1±3.2

Man, %

10 (50%)

10 (50%)

Women, %

10 (50%)

10 (50%)

LDLC level, mmol/L (М±SD)

4.1±0.83

3.7±0.98

During the entire course of treatment, patients in the control group received a standard low-calorie diet with a decrease in table salt (≤ 2.5 g per day), animal fats (less than 10% of the daily caloric content of the diet), sugar (≤ 10 g per day), cholesterol-containing products, and extractives. During the course of inpatient treatment, patients in the main group were provided with a modified version of the standard low-calorie diet, which included 100 mL of CTE.

The nutritional value of the CTE is presented in Table 2.

Table 2. Nutritional value of the CTE

Carbohydrates,

%

Proteins,

%

Organic acids, %

Energetical

value, kcal

65.0

3.5

1.0

277.0

Table 3 shows the characteristics of the diets of the patients.

Table 3. The average daily content of nutrients and the energy value of the standard diet and experimental diet with the CTE.

Diet

Proteins, g per day

Fats, g per day

Carbohydrates, g per day

Energetical value, kcal per day

Standard diet

84.8–90.0

59.6–63.3

200.8–213.2

1678–1781

The proportion of daily caloric intake

20%

31%

49%

Experimental diet

88.3–93.5

59.6–63.3

265.8–278.2

1955–2058

The proportion of daily caloric intake

18%

27%

55%

As can be seen from Table 3, the addition of CTE to the diet preserves the classical distribution of macronutrients in the diet. At the same time, the addition of CTE to the diet was accompanied by the exclusion of additional sugars, which did not significantly increase the proportion of simple carbohydrates in the diet [24-26].

The administration of medicines was carried out in accordance with clinical recommendations for diseases of a therapeutic profile [27, 28]. All therapy was continued during the follow-up period at the same doses. In this regard, the groups were comparable in this indicator. All patients were told about the composition, method of application, and expected therapeutic and preventive effects of the applied diets, and a voluntary consent was signed to participate in the study. Notably, the inclusion of CTE in the diet was well tolerated, and there were no refusals to participate in the study.

Statistical data processing was carried out using the STATISTICA 12 software. The indicators were given as the mean (M) and standard deviation of the mean (SD) for indicators that demonstrated a normal distribution, and the median (Me) and the 25th 75th percentile for indicators that demonstrated a distribution other than normal. The comparison of the two groups based on a quantitative indicator with a normal distribution, assuming equal variances, was conducted using Student's t-test. In cases where variances were unequal, Welch's t-test was employed. For the comparison of the groups using a quantitative parameter whose distribution deviated from the normal one, the Mann–Whitney U-test was applied. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05, indicating differences in the indicators [29].

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The study revealed that almost all patients included in the study had a decrease in body weight as a result of the course of complex treatment. This is in line with results observed in parallel studies [30-33]. The comparative characteristics of the parameters of anthropometry in dynamics between groups are presented in Table 4.

Table 4. Dynamics of anthropometry parameters in patients under the influence of diet therapy

Index

Experimental group

Mе [25th ; 75th percentile]

Control group

Mе [25th ; 75th percentile]

Body weight, kg

Before diet

107.5 [103.9; 110.7]

102.5 [103.6; 115.4]

 

After diet

103.2 [96.0; 106.6]

100.7 [94.4; 105.9]

 

р-value

p≤0.05

p≤0.05

 

Body mass index, kg/m2

Before diet

38.7 [36.7; 40.1]

38.3 [35.4; 39.2]

 

After diet

37.5 [35.2; 39.1]

37.4 [33.5;38.6]

 

 

Despite the higher calorie content of the diet with CTE inclusion, in both groups, there was a comparable statistically different decrease in body weight from the initial one. The same results were obtained in recent relevant works [34-37]. The results of laboratory data before and after the course of diet therapy are presented in Table 5.

Table 5. Indicators of the clinical effectiveness of dietary therapy using CTE

Index

Experimental group M±SD

Control group

SD

TG, mmol/L (0–1.7)

Before diet

1.3±0.55

1.5±0.31

After diet

1.0±0.54

1.15±0.65

р-value

p>0.05

p>0.05

HDLC, mmol/L (0.92–2.06)

Before diet

1.3±0.44

1.0±0.17

After diet

1.2±0.36

1.0±0.15

р-value

p>0.05

p>0.05

LDLC, mmol/L (0–3.8)

Before diet

4.1±0.83

3.7±0.98

 

After diet

2.5±0.80

3.3±0.58

 

р-value

p≤0.05

p>0.05

 

                 

Against the background of diet therapy without changing drug therapy, a decrease in LDLC levels was noted in the experimental group compared with the control group while maintaining HDLC levels. There was no significant decrease in TG levels in the groups. At the same time, when adding CTE to the diet, there was no increase in the level of urea, creatinine, aspartate transaminase (AST), or alanine transaminase (ALT) (Table 6).

Table 6. Indicators of biochemical blood analysis of patients of the experimental group

Index

M±SD

Urea, mmol/L (2.6–7.2)

Before diet

5.2±1.09

 

After diet

4.9±1.11

 

р-value

p>0.05

 

Creatinine, µmol/l (44.0–97.0)

Before diet

78.6±12.39

 

After diet

82.4±15.43

 

р-value

p>0.05

 

AST, Units/L (0-40.0)

Before diet

24.4 ±7.33

 

After diet

24.3±7.39

 

р-value

p>0.05

 

ALT, Units/L (0-40.0)

Before diet

25.0±10.82

 

After diet

23.75±9.65

 

р-value

p>0.05

 

         

These results indicate the safety of the proposed diet therapy and its effectiveness in reducing LDLC levels. However, it is worth noting that the study involved a small number of patients, which limits the generalizability of the results. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to confirm these findings and determine the optimal duration and frequency of CTE use in diet therapy.

In conclusion, the addition of CTE to diet therapy without changing drug therapy showed promising results in terms of reducing LDLC levels while maintaining HDLC and TG levels. This suggests that CTE may be a useful tool in managing lipid metabolism and cardiovascular health [38-42]. However, further research is required to fully understand the potential benefits and limitations of this approach.

CONCLUSION

The comprehensive data on the assessment of the effect of CTE in the system of complex treatment of patients with dyslipidemia revealed several clinical benefits. The study showed that the course of diet therapy with CTE was well-tolerated by patients. Moreover, the results demonstrated a reduction in MT and BMI comparable to standard diet therapy. This suggests that CTE can be an effective tool for weight management in addition to its lipid-lowering properties. Furthermore, there was a positive impact on blood lipid profile. There was a statistically significant decrease in LDLC levels, while HDLC remained unchanged. This indicates that CTE may target specific cholesterol levels without affecting overall cardiovascular health. Additionally, liver function markers such as AST, ALT, creatinine, and uric acid did not change among patients receiving CTE. This is important because it shows that CTE does not cause any adverse effects on liver function.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: None

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None

FINANCIAL SUPPORT: None

ETHICS STATEMENT: The administration of medicines was carried out in accordance with clinical recommendations for diseases of a therapeutic profile. All patients were told about the composition, method of application and expected therapeutic and preventive effect of the applied diets, and a voluntary consent was signed to participate in the study.

References
  1. Fu T, Liu H, Shi C, Zhao H, Liu F, Xia Y. Global hotspots and trends of nutritional supplements in sport and exercise from 2000 to 2024: A bibliometric analysis. J Health Popul Nutr. 2024;43(1):146. doi:10.1186/s41043-024-00638-9
  2. Gonzalez Navarro B, Egido Moreno S, Omaña Cepeda C, Estrugo Devesa A, Jane Salas E, Lopez Lopez J. Relationship between oral lichen planus and cardiovascular disease of atherosclerotic origin: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2024;13(16):4630. doi:10.3390/jcm13164630
  3. Levochkina ED, Belyaev NG, Guagov AR, Haraziya RS, Lebedeva AA, Vinogradova AS, et al. Biomarkers in predicting myocardial damage in athletes. J Med Pharm Chem Res. 2025;7(2):255-65. doi:10.48309/jmpcr.2025.453328.1195
  4. Belenkov YN, Ilgisonis IS, Khabarova NV, Yu YY. Modern instrumental methods of diagnostics and risk assessment of developing antitumor therapy cardiovasculotoxicity. Kardiologiia. 2024;64(8):3-12. Russian, English. doi:10.18087/cardio.2024.8.n2753
  5. Bielick CG, Arnold CJ, Chu VH. Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections: A contemporary review. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2024:S0891-5520(24)00055-2. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2024.07.004
  6. Bashir B, Schofield J, Downie P, France M, Ashcroft DM, Wright AK, et al. Beyond LDL-C: Unravelling the residual atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk landscape-focus on hypertriglyceridaemia. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024;11:1389106. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1389106
  7. Lei S, Liu C, Zheng TX, Fu W, Huang MZ. The relationship of redox signaling with the risk for atherosclerosis. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1430293. doi:10.3389/fphar.2024.1430293
  8. Liu YJ, Wang XQ, Zhang G, Zhao Q, Cheng YX, Liu S, et al. The association between food environments and cardiovascular disease outcomes: A systematic review. Heart Lung. 2024;68:359-66. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.08.019
  9. Renkens MPL, Coerkamp CF, Witte LS, Sivanesan S, Nurmohamed NS, Westerterp M, et al. Lipoprotein(a) in interventional cardiology: Identifying patients at highest risk of recurrent cardiovascular events through early recognition - A case based review. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2024;22(8):353-66. doi:10.1080/14779072.2024.2387678
  10. Milani JGPO, Milani M, Verboven K, Cipriano G Jr, Hansen D. Exercise intensity prescription in cardiovascular rehabilitation: Bridging the gap between best evidence and clinical practice. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024;11:1380639. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1380639
  11. Lee H, Cho HJ, Han Y, Lee SH. Mid- to long-term efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2024;15(1):290. doi:10.1186/s13287-024-03891-1
  12. Rwebembera J, Beaton A. Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease: Updates in diagnosis and treatment. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2024;36(5):496-502. doi:10.1097/MOP.0000000000001384
  13. Zitzmann M. Testosterone deficiency and chronic kidney disease. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2024;37:100365. doi:10.1016/j.jcte.2024.100365
  14. Sadovoy VV, Selimov MA, Slichedrina TV, Nagdalian AA. Usage of biological active supplements in technology of prophilactic meat products. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci. 2016;7(5):1861-5.
  15. Parekumbel Venu A, Rajkumar R, Dinesh Roy D, Thekkumkara Prabhakaran S, Shankar K, Jayapal V, et al. Association of H-FABP with cardiovascular events: A systematic review. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2024;16(2):77-87. doi:10.34172/jcvtr.33039
  16. Duell PB, Welty FK, Miller M, Chait A, Hammond G, Ahmad Z, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and cardiovascular risk: A scientific statement from the American heart association. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2022;42(6):e168-85. doi:10.1161/ATV.0000000000000153
  17. O'Sullivan JW, Raghavan S, Marquez-Luna C, Luzum JA, Damrauer SM, Ashley EA, et al. Polygenic risk scores for cardiovascular disease: A scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation. 2022;146(8):e93-e118. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001077
  18. Sadovoy VV, Selimov M, Shchedrina T, Nagdalian AA. Nutritional supplement for control of diabetes. J Excip Food Chem. 2017;8352017:1843
  19. Dias KJ, Pignataro RM, Heick JD. Risk factor management for patients with atrial fibrillation in home healthcare. Home Healthc Now. 2024;42(5):301-7. doi:10.1097/NHH.0000000000001274
  20. Chen E, Xi L. Cardiovascular adverse effects of antiviral therapies for COVID-19: Evidence and plausible mechanisms. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2024. doi:10.1038/s41401-024-01382-w
  21. Sawicka B, Skiba D, Pszczółkowski P, Aslan I, Sharifi-Rad J, Krochmal-Marczak B. Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) as a medicinal plant and its natural products. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2020;66(4):160-77.
  22. Wang Y, Zhao Y, Xue F, Nan X, Wang H, Hua D, et al. Nutritional value, bioactivity, and application potential of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) as a neotype feed resource. Anim Nutr. 2020;6(4):429-37. doi:10.1016/j.aninu.2020.09.001
  23. Krämer I, Goelz R, Gille C, Härtel C, Müller R, Orlikowsky T, et al. Good handling practice of parenterally administered medicines in neonatal intensive care units - Position paper of an interdisciplinary working group. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2023;18:Doc10. doi:10.3205/dgkh000436
  24. Sinha P, Calfee CS, Delucchi KL. Practitioner's guide to latent class analysis: Methodological considerations and common pitfalls. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(1):e63-e79. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000004710
  25. Khan SS, Coresh J, Pencina MJ, Ndumele CE, Rangaswami J, Chow SL, et al. Novel prediction equations for absolute risk assessment of total cardiovascular disease incorporating cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic health: A scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation. 2023;148(24):1982-2004. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001191
  26. Rajendran A, Minhas AS, Kazzi B, Varma B, Choi E, Thakkar A, et al. Sex-specific differences in cardiovascular risk factors and implications for cardiovascular disease prevention in women. Atherosclerosis. 2023;384:117269. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2023
  27. Teo KK, Rafiq T. Cardiovascular risk factors and prevention: A perspective from developing countries. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37(5):733-43. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2021.02.009
  28. Wan X, Guo H, Liang Y, Zhou C, Liu Z, Li K, et al. The physiological functions and pharmaceutical applications of inulin: A review. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;246:116589. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116589
  29. Fernandes A, Nair A, Kulkarni N, Todewale N, Jobby R. Exploring mushroom polysaccharides for the development of novel prebiotics: A review. Int J Med Mushrooms. 2023;25(2):1-10. doi:10.1615/IntJMedMushrooms.2022046837
  30. Frazaei MH, Nouri R, Arefnezhad R, Pour PM, Naseri M, Assar S. A review of medicinal plants and phytochemicals for the management of gout. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2024;20(3):223-40. doi:10.2174/0115733971268037230920072503
  31. Flori L, Piragine E, Calderone V, Testai L. Role of hydrogen sulfide in the regulation of lipid metabolism: Implications on cardiovascular health. Life Sci. 2024;341:122491. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2024.122491
  32. Wiciński M, Fajkiel-Madajczyk A, Kurant Z, Liss S, Szyperski P, Szambelan M, et al. Ashwagandha's multifaceted effects on human health: Impact on vascular endothelium, inflammation, lipid metabolism, and cardiovascular outcomes-A review. Nutrients. 2024;16(15):2481. doi:10.3390/nu16152481
  33. Chen L, Chen XW, Huang X, Song BL, Wang Y, Wang Y. Regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism in health and disease. Sci China Life Sci. 2019;62(11):1420-58. doi:10.1007/s11427-019-1563-3
  34. Deprince A, Haas JT, Staels B. Dysregulated lipid metabolism links NAFLD to cardiovascular disease. Mol Metab. 2020;42:101092. doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101092
  35. Szántó M, Gupte R, Kraus WL, Pacher P, Bai P. PARPs in lipid metabolism and related diseases. Prog Lipid Res. 2021;84:101117. doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2021.101117
  36. Nurcahyo H, Riyanta AB, Febriyanti R, Sutanto H, Herdwiani W. Hypolipidemic activity of Ceciwis ethanol extract on wistar rats induced by high fat in vivo. J Adv Pharm Educ Res. 2023;13(1):100-4.
  37. Awasthi A, Bigoniya P, Gupta B. Physicochemical properties and in vitro anti-obesity potential of anethum graveolens (Dill) seed cake. Int J Pharm Res Allied Sci. 2024;13(2):48-57.
  38. Alkattaby LA. Biophysical effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles in alleviate lipid and serum glucose. J Biochem Technol. 2023;14(2):134-41.
  39. Baharith AA, Alharbi ON. Prevalence of risky behaviors among patients attending diabetes and endocrinology clinics in KFAFH 2022. Pharmacophore. 2023;14(1):100-10.
  40. Mukhametova Y, Tokhiriyon B, Poznyakovsky V, Pastushkova E, Toshev A. Supplements with polyprenols: Assessment of the Russian market potential. Int J Pharm Res Allied Sci. 2023;12(2):128-32.
  41. Ostashchenko T, Lutska A, Tomchuk V, Koval A, Solomennyi A, Snizhynskyi S, et al. Current trends in the development of the pharmaceutical market in Ukraine. Pharmacophore. 2023;14(4):64-7.
  42. Smalls T, Hailemeskel B. Metformin use review in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NFLDA) and students survey. Int J Pharm Phytopharmacol Res. 2024;14(1):8-15.

 

 

 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.